Chats

I’ll be honest, one of the reasons I feel like I can’t properly immerse myself in this forum is down to how public it is. Along with the fact i have never felt comfortable in a group of people, and essentially that’s just what this place is. Years ago yahoo chat and msn worked for me, the general asl gave you a clue who you might click with, and more often than not you’d start a private chat. Eventually you’d click with someone (or a few people) and form an online friendship. I miss that! 

So I’m putting myself out there, if anyone feels similar, message me. I don’t bite, we might not click, we might well click, who knows.  

Parents
  • So I’m putting myself out there, if anyone feels similar, message me. I don’t bite, we might not click, we might well click, who knows.

    This is a nice sentiment, putting yourself out there, but I think what would help is if you shared a bit more about your hobbies and interests. I think shared interests would leave more room for healthy conversation.

  • Yes I do get that, but as I said I’m really not comfortable revealing anything personal about myself on a public forum where anyone can see, and possibly put 2 and 2 together and have someone work out who I am.

    I also really do struggle with posting in large groups. 

Reply
  • Yes I do get that, but as I said I’m really not comfortable revealing anything personal about myself on a public forum where anyone can see, and possibly put 2 and 2 together and have someone work out who I am.

    I also really do struggle with posting in large groups. 

Children
  • That’s fair enough. 

  • Thanks for your long reply. That sounds like way too much work ha! It’s also the group aspect, I’ve never felt comfortable in that kind of setting. 

  • HMO raised a good point about suggesting the potential neutrality / anonymous aspect made available via shared interests.

    How about "the natural environment" - that might lend itself to a more anonymous series of threads.  You need not make it as personal as for some other topics.

    For example, if there were a thread to do with the coastline - it is not necessary to describe personally identifiable details by saying where you have visited (as just an interesting a conversation might be conducted about places people had heard about and why that sounded attractive).

    E.g. I enjoy rugged coastlines rather than the bucket and spade style.  There are some new stretches of coastal paths which have been opened up around the UK during the years since I last walked a stretch of a UK coastal path.  Once I along one of those walks I was surprised to spot a large area of the invasive plant "Japanese Knotweed" adjacent to the footpath (you can imagine I very carefully quarantined my walking trainers at the end of the walk until I could clean them super thoroughly!) ...and so forth (would you feel comfortable about that type of neutral chat?

    If someone takes a conversation down a too personal trajectory you do not have to follow - a redirect is always your prerogative.

    To extend such a thread - some other people like plants / insects / wildlife / photography / sunsets etc. any of which such topics could be woven into "the natural environment" or "coastline" thread ...still anonymously.

    No need to respond quickly - or at all - why not mull it over to suit yourself.

  • I get that but shared interests won't make you identifiable. It would be difficult for someone to decide to reach out to you without that.