The Choice

Does this make any kind of sense to anyone?

For me, society seems to be present me with a choice

1. Act normal, uptight and be accepted on the surface, as a walk down the street, but feel depressed, isolated because I have internally obliterated some of the essential quirky parts of my character.

2. Relax, act a bit quirky, and have people avoid me in the street, and be treated like some kind of rapist, mad animal or wierd alien sub-species.

From my own perspective, it seems that people outside have this extra, unnecessary layer, that is like an armed militaristic assault vehicle designed to convince people of their social status - it makes them seem fake, uptight and often rather reactionary, even if they identify as progressive or left wing, because they can't see past their social conditioning needs, that they push in my face at every possible mimenf. If I try to conform to their behaviours of physical uptightness, pushing out my personality like some kind of armed militaristic assault vehicle then my body has to become extremely tense indeed, it's like I'm absorbing all their uptightness, and externally I seem to go to the extreme of their behaviour and often appear robotic or irritable or unreasonably idealistic.

So, that's my dilemma either become robotic or be treated like a potential alien-weirdo-rapist.

Sound familiar, or not?

Parents
  • I live in a village where there is this lad, roughly 17. He is autistic, but to a much greater degree than me. He dresses as a Jedi to go outside and i often see him in the street practicing with his light sabre. 

    Many people laugh at him or pretend he doesnt exist. The first time i saw him i walked right up to him and said 'dude that is the coolest thing i have seen all year'. 

    He looked at me and simply said 'thank you.' 

    Given a choice i am always my quirky self. Let the people laugh or ignore me. That way i know that the people that talk to me are not hostile. 

  • Encouraging him was probably the most evil thing you have ever done in your life. He needed guidance on how to blend in and interact with society, not the contrary.

  • Why would that be? Why should everyone blend in. 

    You have a very small minded view. I dont blend in. I dont want to. Neither does he. 

    1. Nope actually it's arround the same. About 1% of the population for homosexuals and autistic people. Although there is variation depending on the statistic and how it was compiled.
    2. There didn't used to be
    3. your subjective opinion ... I couldn't comment. But it's been my observation people can do more than they think they can when they resolve to take action.
  • I think the way you seem to think gay people are a fairly homogenous group who can easily "be seen as a single body by the public" actually shows how easily autistic people could be seen in the same way.

    I think I laid out the thinking very clearly - do you really believe that the public can see such a disparate group who have a single label as a homogenous group?

    What other group of people can you think of who have achieved anything like this have such as nebulous range of traits?

    Being autistic is not a single trait. It is a label covering a huge range of traits and this is the core reason I think we will not be seen the same way.

  • I think the way you seem to think gay people are a fairly homogenous group who can easily "be seen as a single body by the public" actually shows how easily autistic people could be seen in the same way.

    Gay people aren't any less different from each other than autistic people, especially if you include all people who experience same-sex attraction (idk why this thread keeps shorthanding anyone who isn't strictly into their own sex out of existence). 

  • You've gone so far from the original point to split hairs over something not relevant to what I was talking about in the first place

    The conversation moved on from the original point long ago.

    I was very clearly talking about a detail that was brought up as part of it and made it clear what it was and even laid it out plainly to save your time, but I feel you are the one who is now willingly ignoring the point for some reason.

    Conversations evolve and arguing that it wasn't what you wanted to talk about and throwing the toys out of the pramb reflects poorly on your debating ability.

    You are still trying to compare gays and autists. One group has a single identifiable trait that earns them the label of gay but autists are a massivly complex grouping of traits that are only identifiable through a slightly arbitory definition of autism (ie if you get more than an arbitory score on tests to see if you have enought of a diverse range traits at a high enough level).

    It is like comparing apples with a baked Alaska.

    Why does the comparison matter? Because of how we are seen by the society we are railing against to get recognition and accommodation from.

    A famous quote is something like "you have met one autist and you have met only one autist". We are typically nothing alike so for us to be seen as a single body by  the public we are going to have a massive struggle compared to gays for example.

    I'm interested in finding out how we are going to present ourselves as a unity - something people can identify and accept that we need to have changes in society made for us.

    I believe this will be incredibly difficult so I'm looking for ideas to help develop a strategy for this.

    Does anyone have a suggestion on how we can work towards this?

Reply
  • You've gone so far from the original point to split hairs over something not relevant to what I was talking about in the first place

    The conversation moved on from the original point long ago.

    I was very clearly talking about a detail that was brought up as part of it and made it clear what it was and even laid it out plainly to save your time, but I feel you are the one who is now willingly ignoring the point for some reason.

    Conversations evolve and arguing that it wasn't what you wanted to talk about and throwing the toys out of the pramb reflects poorly on your debating ability.

    You are still trying to compare gays and autists. One group has a single identifiable trait that earns them the label of gay but autists are a massivly complex grouping of traits that are only identifiable through a slightly arbitory definition of autism (ie if you get more than an arbitory score on tests to see if you have enought of a diverse range traits at a high enough level).

    It is like comparing apples with a baked Alaska.

    Why does the comparison matter? Because of how we are seen by the society we are railing against to get recognition and accommodation from.

    A famous quote is something like "you have met one autist and you have met only one autist". We are typically nothing alike so for us to be seen as a single body by  the public we are going to have a massive struggle compared to gays for example.

    I'm interested in finding out how we are going to present ourselves as a unity - something people can identify and accept that we need to have changes in society made for us.

    I believe this will be incredibly difficult so I'm looking for ideas to help develop a strategy for this.

    Does anyone have a suggestion on how we can work towards this?

Children
  • I think the way you seem to think gay people are a fairly homogenous group who can easily "be seen as a single body by the public" actually shows how easily autistic people could be seen in the same way.

    I think I laid out the thinking very clearly - do you really believe that the public can see such a disparate group who have a single label as a homogenous group?

    What other group of people can you think of who have achieved anything like this have such as nebulous range of traits?

    Being autistic is not a single trait. It is a label covering a huge range of traits and this is the core reason I think we will not be seen the same way.

  • I think the way you seem to think gay people are a fairly homogenous group who can easily "be seen as a single body by the public" actually shows how easily autistic people could be seen in the same way.

    Gay people aren't any less different from each other than autistic people, especially if you include all people who experience same-sex attraction (idk why this thread keeps shorthanding anyone who isn't strictly into their own sex out of existence).