Published on 12, July, 2020
So another thread relating to trans rights has been locked under Rule 4 ‘Be Nice’ , but shouldn’t hatred directed at trans people be actually deleted? The thread was going really well with lots of trans, gender fluid and queer people supporting each other, but as usual the cis hets dive in to invalidate us. The mod response is not to target the prejudice but to lock the entire thread! This is wrong. Can we trans and queer and pride people on the spectrum not have a safe space here? I know the mods have a policy of non-deletion but this is wrong, were racist comments being made I’m sure they’d pounce on that pdq, but hate against trans people is unchallenged and left to stand. Apalling of you NAS!
Racism was allowed on here for a while also.I think i tend towards free speech absolutism as this will protect the rights of the vulnerable to speak and help us in the long run.
I’ve generally read “free speech absolutism” as short hand for the alt right, Trump obsessed, Q-Anon vitriol directed at everyone who non-conforms to their religion based stereotypes, are you going to disprove me?
"It seems that a small group of very strident people think they have special rights and must be treated with the utmost respect whilst they reserve the right to pillory anyone else who does not fit their fantastic world view. "Doesn't it just.
You didn't make ME feel very welcome here, two years ago did you?
Now you are back from your two year sabbatical, I hope you really did learn not to express open hatred for someone's point of view, and try to have them excluded, as your post would suggest you have learned.
You never expressed any remorse, or offered an apology, in the two years since that happened so who knows?
It seems that a small group of very strident people think they have special rights and must be treated with the utmost respect whilst they reserve the right to pillory anyone else who does not fit their fantastic world view.
π Bees π (they/them) Autism resources in bio #stoptheshock #NothingAboutUsWithoutUs said:Also as a privately run site with rules* set out as terms for joining the quashing of hatespeech on this forum could never interfere with someone's right to expression as doing so doesn't prohibit or physically stop them from making their own sites to use as a platform to say whatever they like without moderation.* And rules once set must be enforced and adhered to equally in order to be fair to all the users on this site.
For those that missed it here is Rule 7:"
Also the way some people on here can take two unrelated premices and just form whatever conclusion conveniently fits their bias world view is astounding.
the government and rich elite are a minority group though.we call the rich the top 1% or something.... thats a minority... if free speech cant be used against minorities then the rich elite are protected.
They shouldn't have to set up their own communities as they are a part of this one. Everyone with Autism should feel welcome here.
Yep, that's exactly what many people with niche interests do.
They set up their own servers to discuss their own niche interests, rather than trying to bend other peoples communities to suit their own special requirements.
My view has a lot of grey area and overlap it isn't going to be the exact same form of liberatarianism as other people, so I understand if you cannot see my point of view but respectfully I stand by what I said about the rules. People agree to them when they sign up and cannot be allowed to just opt out of them afterwards unless they leave the site that's why these things are usually included as part of the terms of service/use/membership/delete as applicable.
Repressing hate by driving it underground is counter productive. As people can still think what they like but as it is no longer being expressed openly, it is no longer being challenged. I don't think you understand what i mean by Libertarian either. There is nothing centrist about my views and nothing pro-market or pro private interest about them.
It's true, I myself am a centre left libertarian, for example I don't think it should be so that people can be punished by green tax when going into cities, not everyone wants one of these ugly new computers on wheels but the solution should be a subsidy to have older less fuel efficient engines refitted with younger performance comparabe model compatible models with a better fuel consumption and improved emissions. It's not right that historical models can be lovingly cared for for decades only to potentially be legislated off the road, which by means of forcing people to give up their property against their will effectively creates a legal form of theft committed by the government against the public. But that's a wholly another subject and I'll only mention it this once here to illustrate a point, it's not an invitation to take the topic of this thread off track.Bottom line is, I'm not interested in being the thought police, 1984 no thanks, but free speech was intened to be held as a right for the public to be free to criticise their governments without reprisal not to allow hate speech against minority groups. Also as a privately run site with rules* set out as terms for joining the quashing of hatespeech on this forum could never interfere with someone's right to expression as doing so doesn't prohibit or physically stop them from making their own sites to use as a platform to say whatever they like without moderation.* And rules once set must be enforced and adhered to equally in order to be fair to all the users on this site.
Well i'm none of those things. I would say that the position is extremely Libertarian. And of course there are Libertarians on the Left as well as the Right.