Published on 12, July, 2020
What are the rules around that?
We just need good taste, avoid discussing prostitutes etc.
What I can’t talk about my career ambitions to make it as a high class jigalo that exclusively services supper models? :p
Ok, talk about it. Just don't post any explicit pictures to illustrate your points.
dude will use whatever's ... at hand..
s'pose.
This clearly isn't the "adult" section anymore...
How about we try to adress each others aguments instead of resorting to impuning each other charicter? Preferably in another thread because I don't think this thread is about trans issues rights and wrongs.
Defining an aberrant and cowardly *** is fairly simple. An amoral wretch posing as some sort of intellectual, as it's all they have.
call it artistic interpritation. I'm not drawing a picture of my penis for you all :P
semantics and people are not distinct. How you define man or woman is a question of semantics. How you define trans is a question of semantics. There are few questions where semantic interpritation is so vital as gender.
How can I possibly know they are wearing clothes if they haven't been drawn yet?
I am not a mind reader... even though I sometimes wish I was. Lol.
I wasn't talking about semantics. I was talking about people.
or maybe you know they're wearing clothes that just haven't been drawn ...
I notice you say trans and not transexual. The medical and legal term relating to those who have / are prepairing to have medical sex changes. The term trans / transgender didn't really exist pre transexuals and transexuals didn't exist untill doctors started doing sex changes. If you went to an 18th century molly house you would have seen 'men' in dresses having sex with and even 'marrying' other men. They wouldn't have used the word trans. Trans and gay culture and identerty were not distinct.
RHS? Royal Horticultural Society?
Muchly confused.
An FTM trans saving for the op is certainly not something I had thought of, so thank you for putting it forward as a reason why Peter's stick man doesn't have a doo-dah... wotsit... thingy.
I posit that you know it's not a modern idea as it has already been explained to you a thousand times that it isn't. LGBT folk have always existed.
Maybe RHS stickperson is FTM trans and is saving up the the Gigolo gig cash for the second surgery?
That's such a modern Idea and would never have occurred to me a scant few years ago...
Perhaps 'Stick Man Gigolo' had been a VERY naughty boy, and 'Supermodel Stick Woman' had done the unthinkable and chopped it off.
Isn't your stick man somewhat unequipped with the usual tool for the job?
Peter, I never assume stick people are wearing clothes unless it is obvious that they are wearing clothes.
Not quite sure what that says about me.
I can't see why it would. After all you just asume stick men (or women) are wearing cloathes even if you never see them drawn.
Statistically supermodels are taller than The average man. And I’m not that tall.
also in an art package it’s harder to make 2 unequally sized circles than equally sized ones.
however lots of my friends have been really well endowed. One of my best friends was a double G cup. It’s actually more common to have more modestly endowed supermodels.
but be my guest please do illustrate your ideal man.
Why do I find myself thinking that it is no accident that your head is more or less parallel with your well-endowed supermodel's chest shelf?... So perfectly rounded and equal in size that one is inclined to think her 'shelf' is not natural.
Is it any wonder that some females get fed up with having to tell some males, "That's not where my face is!" when they are conversing!!!
I feel so very tempted to do my own artist's impression of my idea of a perfect male supermodel... just to get my own back and level the playing field.