UFO?

The "powers that be" will have filmed, photographed, probed, scanned, tracked and imaged these "objects" in considerable detail before blowing them out of the sky.

I don't understand why they can't just say that, and then flash us either a concerned "everyone to the bunkers" concerned face, or a knowing "these pesky foreigners" wink.

I don't understand why we, the people, cannot just be told.

In 2004 I took up researching UFO reports when I came to the conclusions that some of them fit my personal requirements for credibility, and that they indicated that a novel physics was available for the taking. 

It took me down a 7 year rabbit hole during which I read a vast amount about potential novel propulsion techniques and learned a small amount of practical information, such that I was able to make things, do experiments and generally have a good time with bits of wire and high voltages.

I've corresponded with many household names in the field over the years, most of whom have been very helpful & down to earth types. I've built up my own mental model of what is going on in this field certainly between the war years and the 1970's and how it works.

I find it hard to believe that we can suddenly shoot them down with an AIM9x, it seems about as likely as it did  to me two years ago when it was suggested that we were able to develop a vaccine that works against the common cold, for much the same reasons.

Speed.

All the UFO reports I've read report great capabilities in terms of acceleration and direction changing ability, and all the previous attempts I've read of to shoot them down have ended in dismal failure. Reports are that the drive system used in normal use causes a reduction in the binding force of matter.

Such that a popular UFO detector is basically two dissimilar materials under tension, with a needle arranged to move if either of them weakens. (From memory it's nylon and a steel spring) It is checked every day to see if you have had a UFO overfly your house...

I mention this because I read one report where the pilot after engaging with a UFO, using missiles and guns literally had his aeroplane disintegrate around him. 

Eventually, (it is alledged) the US government found that a certain radar frequency would cause some UFO's to crash by directly interfering with the field propulsion system they use. 

Now although NONE of the above (except my own experimenting and results) do I know to be true, I have applied a filter to my information over the last few years..  As a conspiracy theorist I'm really good at spotting the most of the fakes quickly...

But it should be noted, any real diligence I've applied to processing the information was focussed on the technology, not the secret meetings with strawberry ice cream loving ET.s in 1957, or the Ronald Reagan UFO briefing, or "serpo" exchange programme etc. except to enjoy them as lurid stories...  

Based on what I've observed, it's more likely that this is an attempted distraction from the several big embarrassments the U.S. government has ongoing at this time, political sleight of hand as it were.

Would be my guess.

Unless "Project Blue Beam" is real, of course... ;c)

In 2004 I took up researching UFO reports when I came to the conclusions that some of them fit my personal requirements for credibility, and that they indicated that a novel physics was available for the taking. 

It took me down a 7 year rabbit hole during which I read a vast amount about potential novel propulsion techniques and learned a small amount of practical information, such that I was able to make things, do experiments and generally have a good time with bits of wire and high voltages.

I've corresponded with many household names in the field over the years, most of whom have been very helpful & down to earth types. I've built up my own mental model of what is going on in this field certainly between the war years and the 1970's and how it works.

I find it hard to believe that we can suddenly shoot them down with an AIM9x, it seems about as likely as it did  to me two years ago when it was suggested that we were able to develop a vaccine that works against the common cold, for much the same reasons.

Speed.

All the UFO reports I've read report great capabilities in terms of acceleration and direction changing ability, and all the previous attempts I've read of to shoot them down have ended in dismal failure. Reports are that the drive system used in normal use causes a reduction in the binding force of matter.

Such that a popular UFO detector is basically two dissimilar materials under tension, with a needle arranged to move if either of them weakens. (From memory it's nylon and a steel spring) It is checked every day to see if you have had a UFO overfly your house...

I mention this because I read one report where the pilot after engaging with a UFO, using missiles and guns literally had his aeroplane disintegrate around him. 

Eventually, (it is alledged) the US government found that a certain radar frequency would cause some UFO's to crash by directly interfering with the field propulsion system they use. 

Now although NONE of the above (except my own experimenting and results) do I know to be true, I have applied a filter to my information over the last few years..  As a conspiracy theorist I'm really good at spotting the most of the fakes quickly...

But it should be noted, any real diligence I've applied to processing the information was focussed on the technology, not the secret meetings with strawberry ice cream loving ET.s in 1957, or the Ronald Reagan UFO briefing, or "serpo" exchange programme etc. except to enjoy them as lurid stories...  

Based on what I've observed, it's more likely that this is an attempted distraction from the several big embarrassments the U.S. government has ongoing at this time, political sleight of hand as it were.

Would be my guess.

Unless "Project Blue Beam" is real, of course... ;c)

37-odd Trillion in debt.