Autism is a real disability to some,,,,,,, are you such a person ?

sayings like , "autism is a superpower" or "autism isn't a disability, it is a different ability" worry me sometimes

I feel like this invalidates people who aren't quite comfortable with being Autistic or Autistic people who feel as though their ASD has more negative than positive impacts or those who feel as though their diagnosis has an equal amount of positive and negative effects. 

I understand these sayings have positive intentions and are meant to empower Autistic people, but it just kinda comes off as inspirational stuff to me. Again this is good. 

But two thirds of autistic people are in the mid and severe ends of the spectrum and so will probably never/rarely be in this forum or have their voice/opinions heard.

I am lucky to be the way I am.  But there are days I wish I could swallow a pill and my autism would be gone.

I am equal amounts of positive and negative with shrinking negatives.

But I always think about those who are really suffering on the spectrum.

Do you feel Autism is a real downer for you  ?  how bad is it ? and most importantly ,,,,,,,,,What can be done to help or change things for you?

Parents
  • Most of the people on this long thread who judge it as a disability are doing so by comparing their autistic traits to the benchmark set by NT people or based on the negative experiences they have due to the comorbidities of autism not autism itself. Its not a personal opinion, its either a disability or its not. It can't be both at the same time. I put a link on this thread that showed a presentation given by clinicians that showed that when outside observers watched two autistic people (without knowing their diagnosis) they could not tell they were autistic and could only see autism presenting when you had an autistic person interacting with an NT person (funny enough). If thats not strong evidence that its not a disability, just a difference in the type of human being we are,  I don't know what is. People are entitled to their own opinions but not their own facts. I am about the business of facts and clarity.

Reply
  • Most of the people on this long thread who judge it as a disability are doing so by comparing their autistic traits to the benchmark set by NT people or based on the negative experiences they have due to the comorbidities of autism not autism itself. Its not a personal opinion, its either a disability or its not. It can't be both at the same time. I put a link on this thread that showed a presentation given by clinicians that showed that when outside observers watched two autistic people (without knowing their diagnosis) they could not tell they were autistic and could only see autism presenting when you had an autistic person interacting with an NT person (funny enough). If thats not strong evidence that its not a disability, just a difference in the type of human being we are,  I don't know what is. People are entitled to their own opinions but not their own facts. I am about the business of facts and clarity.

Children
  • While I generally agree that asserting that neurotypical society is the correct measuring stick against which to measure autism is highly questionable I must take issue with this one thing you say. that something is a disability or it isn't. Language is messy, words, including disability, often have multiple definitions, often with considerable overlap, but which are not interchangeable. It's entirely possible for something to be and not be a disability depending on the definition you use.

  • fair enough. We only gain from having and expressing different views