ESA - ATOS - Work - Benefits

Is it a fight for rights or a fight for the easy option ?

While some people may not be able to work the bulk of those with mental/physical disabilities or problems are able to do some kind of work, so I think it's only right that the government of any country seeks to solve this problem even if only to reduce the costs of providing for these people.

Some of these people want to work and need to work around their issues though and this seems to be overlooked by the government.

Some of these people though have not worked for many years or not at all and are now being pressured into finding a job so obviously they find it difficult especially when they have problems with the type of work they can do and the environment they need to work in.

Some of these people though do not want to work full stop - and have got used to being provided for, and the thought of them having to do something for themselves seems impossible so they use their disabilities/problems so not to have to work.

I think unless someone is absolutely unable to work then they should not expect any government to provide for them but the way the government are going about it is all wrong - there is no black and white line between either being able or being unable to work - and people should not be pushed or pulled to one side or the other - this creates a gulf between those people and the government whereby the people are fighting to be on one side and the government in fighting to get them on the other side.

For those who have been one one side of the line for most of their life to suddenly find they have been pushed onto the other side can be a huge problem.

I think there should be some middle ground here - such as for example people getting assessed on a points system and then be expected to work a certain amount of hours and then getting reassessed every few months.

I'm also guilty to some degree of finding comfort in the route of wanting to avoid work due to my many problems and I also see this in other people, currently I do want to work but it means facing problems/anxieties etc so I need certain conditions or I need to be eased into it slowly but at one point I was with the attitude that I am sick and have rights etc and should not have to work - but I have now completely changed my point of view - and like a reformed smoker I am starting to feel animosity towards these kind of people now. I now don't believe that having any problems should serve as an excuse not to work and get annoyed when I see people expect to be provided for as I feel it's the easy option.

In life people need to struggle, without struggle people cannot grow. It's easy to claim money and not have to do anything - it's hard to face your problems and take responsibility for yourself. Whoever we are, whatever our problems we should face them and at least put some effort into our lifes rather than take the easy option.

Choosing or fighting to stay on the easy side of the line will only serve to make yourself weaker in the long run.

While many people need help once their environment is comfortable then people should be only be helped by being taught how to help themselves.

Nobody should be entitled to anything that they have not earned themselves.

I am looking for work, I want to work, I want to face my problems and become a stronger better person.

Parents
  • Why?  The Aspie mind is meant to be good at thinking outside of the box, creatively.  Just putting suggestions out there for consideration (that NT's would not have thought of) will give them a lightbulb moment (hopefully) on a new angle.  Why does it have to be an idea based on you being "one of them"?  A cardiac surgeon doesn't come up with surgical techniques because he had a heart attack.

    And of course there are always other possibilities if you want to back your point up further, such as saying I have a family member with autism (which isn't a lie if you think about it) and you asked their opinion, and it's not as if all the Aspies in positions to make a difference are even diagnosed anyway.  Some may be undiagnosed and just aware of feeling different and come up with "Aspie ideas" accordingly, to influence policies.

    In the film "My Big Fat Greek Wedding", the wife said to the daughter that her husband may be the head of the family, but she is the neck, and she can turn that head any way she wants.

    Some of these arrogant types also love to steal an idea as if it were their own, by a subtle suggestion in the right way, they will take all the credit for your idea.

    (I'm beginning to sound NT with all these games! Foot in Mouth)

Reply
  • Why?  The Aspie mind is meant to be good at thinking outside of the box, creatively.  Just putting suggestions out there for consideration (that NT's would not have thought of) will give them a lightbulb moment (hopefully) on a new angle.  Why does it have to be an idea based on you being "one of them"?  A cardiac surgeon doesn't come up with surgical techniques because he had a heart attack.

    And of course there are always other possibilities if you want to back your point up further, such as saying I have a family member with autism (which isn't a lie if you think about it) and you asked their opinion, and it's not as if all the Aspies in positions to make a difference are even diagnosed anyway.  Some may be undiagnosed and just aware of feeling different and come up with "Aspie ideas" accordingly, to influence policies.

    In the film "My Big Fat Greek Wedding", the wife said to the daughter that her husband may be the head of the family, but she is the neck, and she can turn that head any way she wants.

    Some of these arrogant types also love to steal an idea as if it were their own, by a subtle suggestion in the right way, they will take all the credit for your idea.

    (I'm beginning to sound NT with all these games! Foot in Mouth)

Children
No Data