First Post - Autismland Introduction

If you're bored right now, think about it. We always complain about how bad the others treat us. Maybe having our own country, our own rules and an education system will make a difference in our lives.
-----
Autismland is a royalist democratic party in World Aspergers' Organization.
Autismland is a member of the World Aspergers' Organization and the World Aspergers' Organization's Royalist International.
 
[ Programs ]
  • Welfarism.
  • Backing up the Descendants of Hans I (Dr. Johann "Hans" Friedrich Karl Asperger) to the throne.
Positive aspects will be:
  • Royalism.
  • Reformism. Building onto the British know-how and institutes.
  • A Western welfarist monarchy modelled after Great Britain.
[ Symbolism ]
  • The infinity mark symbolizes the sovereign Autist state.
  • Royal colours, the dark red and gold symbolizes the Royalism.
  • The Anglican Bible verse quotes a part of Malachi 3:10 from King James Bible, as a symbol of the welfarirm and the British model.
[ External links ]
Parents Reply
  • A separate country to me is still what I mean by 'separatism'.

    The "Hans Asperger complied with the ***" claim is heavily politically biased - here's why.

    www.reddit.com/.../

    Interesting opinion in the link, but just an opinion. I don't think see why Czech's research is any more biased than any other simplification of working in the 'grey zone'. Steve Silberman seems to accept it. I don't however think we necessarily need to stop using a recognised term (we still refer to Hugo Boss or Fanta despite strong associations with the Nazi party).

    Whoever you had as head of state, president or monarch, or even head of a would society needs to command the vast majority of trust and support, and anything to do with a psychiatrist, let alone Asperger, seems a very odd choice to me.

    Since we are reformist and not revolutionist, so we are not actually very positive about radically and totally new Social Experiments like Basic Income...
    We like to base on existing know-hows and institutes.

    Basic Income isn't necessarily that radical, and it's looking like it may be the only way to cope with mass jobs losses from robots and automation. There was a costed plan in Green Party policy here that's basically a simplification of income tax. It is being tried in various countries around the world. How would your 'welfarism' work?

    I think an autistic city or state would be much more of a 'totally new social experiment'.

Children
  • >choice

    Over my dead body! We want is no one else but Him.

    >the only way

    Negative. There is no such thing as "only way". We can do anything, and it means anything. Nothing is impossible, and we can find many ways to cope with mass jobs losses from robots and automation.

    Furthermore, robotization and automation is most advanced in Japan, and the Japanese unemployment rate is one of the lowest of the advanced world anyway.

    I need successful examples to support this idea. What do you mean "isn't necessarily that radical"?

    PS:

    >How would your 'welfarism' work?

    Autismland's strategy to inherit the British model of welfare state.

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Welfare_state_in_the_United_Kingdom