My thoughts on “mild” autism

During my autism assessment, the psychiatrist said that although my autism affects many aspects of my life, I was still able to communicate to her well and therefore only had it “mild”. I understand that I have low support needs and that other autistic people have different or more extreme struggles and need more support, but I was masking a lot in the assessment in order to answer the questions as clearly as possible, which completely exhausted me and impacted how I felt over the next couple of days. As Keedie said in the TV show “A kind of spark”, her autism only seems mild because ‘we make it so, at a great personal cost’. Autism has a huge impact on my life, even if no one else can see it, and especially if I’m purposefully changing my behaviour to fit in or adapt to other people. Just because it seems mild to you doesn’t mean it actually is to me. I feel like this is why the terms “high functioning” and “low functioning” are being used less in favour of “support needs” which I feel is more accurate and less diminishing of autistic people’s struggles. I’d be interested to know other people’s opinions too as I know some people don’t mind the word “mild”!

Parents
  • I'm an autistic heretic in that I firmly believe  that autism is a disability, and comparatively speaking some are more disabled  by it than others. That doesn't mean  that those doing relatively  well, are difficulty/problem free. That's not what I believe,or will ever believe.

  • I agree.  I think the powerful have a vested interest in people not seeing Autism as a disability.  After all if it's a superpower then you won't be needing any help or  money.

    Get thee to the local chip shop to slave away in the interests of Capital.


Reply
  • I agree.  I think the powerful have a vested interest in people not seeing Autism as a disability.  After all if it's a superpower then you won't be needing any help or  money.

    Get thee to the local chip shop to slave away in the interests of Capital.


Children
No Data