Published on 12, July, 2020
Here's a video I made about The Autism Investor Summit
youtu.be/-UbsdA9a71Q
I mean selfishly I would say towards reducing the social isolation of interlectually able autistic adults. I apreciate there are many other good, arguably more worthy, causes. But we are the cinderelas of the autism services world. We are basicly treated as if we are invisable.
Well, we are a minority and we have lesser need for support. I had seen high support people, and I can accept the fact that they will get priority. Some of them were unable to take a shower or get an haircut without extensive help from a support worker.
yes I have heard these arguments before. but when you factor in depresion and sucide rates into it you need to reasses things. Suporting people to feel like life is worth living is as inportant as suporting people to live. And again autistic people of normal or abouve average inteligence make up the majority of autistic people.
Here's an article that might give you guys a bit of food for thought.
www.longdom.org/.../gabr-genes-autism-spectrum-disorder-and-epilepsy-2165-7890-1000131.pdf
There is no value in acknowledging the way the world is now unless you have a plan to make it better.
You are talking about how the world should be. I agree with you, by the way, but I know that there is no hope to see it happen.
I am talking about how the world is now.
We are just talking about different things.
so your argument in a nut shell is that autism specific funding (which pays for things like sensory rooms and day trips) should be cut and spent instead on basic care needs for disabled people in general (like pip and social care)? Because that's what it sounds like you are saying.
If not lets look at it this way? Isn't a high functioning (as measured by IQ) autistic adult having he opportunity to have a social life as important as a low functioning autistic kid having a sensory room?