Advocacy to help access health care

Thank you to all of you who responded to my last post.

On a personal level, it's comforting to me to know I am not alone in experiencing these problems.  Having been called "delusional" for my medical anxieties in the past by mental health, it is nice to know they are anything but.

On a practical level, I was hearing a number of things in that discussion largely around how to access GPs etc and the absence of reasonable adjustments to communicate with them etc.  Clearly, there is a need for a huge amount of training in this regard. There are further issues with respect to the physical and psychological misdiagnoses and unhelpful or inappropriate treatments sometimes arising from professionals' ignorance.

I have also dug into the helpful links provided by Autonomistic on Autistica's work to progress the issue of annual Health Checks, akin to those offered to people with a Learning Disability.

This post is specifically about advocacy.

Given that so many of us have difficulty in self-advocating in medical environments, to the point of not even getting through the GP's door and past the receptionist to self advocate, what are our thoughts specifically with respect to a service to help us get into the surgery and communicate with the GP.  (Email can do a lot, but regrettably we can't be physically examined by e-mail.  We have to go in sometimes!)

My ex-husband who was a nurse used to advocate for me.  He could approach the reception desk for me, make the phone call for me, intervene and explain what the problem was when I could not find the words, explain what was happening when sensory overwhelm was pushing me into shutdown or meltdown, negotiate reasonable adjustments for me, even made medical decisions for me, when I could not.

Without his help now - I'm stuffed.  Can't get any health care at all.

It seems to me that what is needed to plug the gap for those who don't have a family member to step in, is some sort of autism expert service embedded into the NHS to advocate even at short notice in emergencies.  No such service appears to exist at present.  I've been trying to find one for two years.  Adult social care won't help, existing advocacy services don't go to GPs appointments with people and it takes weeks to get an advocate anyway and the Learning Disability and Autism Team are only commissioned to be doing this for people with a learning disability.

So, do you think this is a good idea?  What would such a service look like to you?  What would you want from it?  Would this make the difference between getting to and through an appointment for you?

Parents
  • You know what dawn, there are many people whose first language is not English - they also have a communication difference and so access to an interpreter. Autism is classed as a communication difference so it really makes sense to have an advocate. This could potentially plug a gap between autistic people and professionals who have not had sufficient training. Rather than training absolutely everyone up, if we had advocates they woukd be the middle man.

  • That's insightful, actually.  

    I'm a linguist by training and often think of the difference between NT/ND communication in terms of two people who speak different languages.  Whose responsibility is it to get the dialogue going?  Well, in most contexts, both equally, of course.  But when accurate communication really matters - say in a court room or a hospital, when one party maybe too vulnerable to jump through grammatical hurdles in a language not their own, we get in an interpreter, do we not?

    In our case it seems, that ALL the responsibility is left with us and no one gets that an interpreter is required when we are vulnerable.

Reply
  • That's insightful, actually.  

    I'm a linguist by training and often think of the difference between NT/ND communication in terms of two people who speak different languages.  Whose responsibility is it to get the dialogue going?  Well, in most contexts, both equally, of course.  But when accurate communication really matters - say in a court room or a hospital, when one party maybe too vulnerable to jump through grammatical hurdles in a language not their own, we get in an interpreter, do we not?

    In our case it seems, that ALL the responsibility is left with us and no one gets that an interpreter is required when we are vulnerable.

Children