Published on 12, July, 2020
Why do people say this? We aren't otherwise there would be no need for a diagnosis.
The spectrum isn't linear. It's not most autistic to least autistic.
FFS this kind of thing annoys me so much
As a scientist I would assert that all spectra are linear, I'm especially aware of this as I worked in mass spectrometry. What is shown visually as an 'autistic spectrum' is in fact an 'autistic colour wheel'. This is a valid way of looking at autism, but it is not a spectrum. I think that if psychologists were more accurate in their use of 'physical science' terms they would have called autism something like 'Autism Continuum Condition'.
Interestingly, recent research is pointing to two genetic inputs into autism. Firstly, numerous small genetic variants close to specific genes that have been associated with autism. These small variations are very common in the population at large. Secondly, smaller numbers of larger genetic change variants close to genes associated with autism. These larger variations are much, much rarer in the general population.
For the type of autism primarily caused by the common genetic variants, the entire population has these variants and it is only a higher than average concentration of them that causes clinical autism. In this case then it could be reasonably claimed that 'everyone is on the spectrum'.
Interesting comment. I suspect that your par 2 is based on some recent peer reviewed published work? If so could you post a link? Many thanks!
You could also claim that everyone feels a bit depressed sometimes, doesn't mean everyone has depression.
You could say that about anything in life really, doesn't mean everyone has a diagnose-able condition.
The statement hugely invalidates autistic people's struggles