Thinking in pictures. Do you?

Is my visual imagination weird compared to yours?

I read a book last year with techniques for overcoming insomnia. One of the exercises was to imagine ten stars shining in the night sky, each representing a worry, and then work through them one-by-one (I forget the details). Anyway, after five decades of existence, I learned something new: I cannot hold a picture of ten stars shining in the night sky in my imagination. In fact, I cannot hold any static image in my imagination. As soon as I try to look at any detail at all, look at one star, say, the image falls apart and all I'm left with is blackness. And I cannot stop myself from trying to look at the details.

The same goes for capturing anything I'm looking at. I can close my eyes now and briefly hold an image of the computer screen in front of me in my mind, but as soon as I try to "look" at any detail, the image disappears to blackness.

Weirdly (I think), what I can do is hold a moving image in my head, spinning it around and looking at it from different angles, resolving more details as I zoom in, becoming more vague as I zoom out, but always staying in motion. For example, I can hold a car engine (ICE) in my head and zoom in and watch individual parts operating and I continue to fly around them, but if I zoom out again it becomes little more than a vague engine block, so the total amount of detail at any zoom level is quite limited. I think this might be because I'm really just creating a series of still images and continuously replacing them as they quickly fade to blackness. I cannot replace one image with another just like it, as I'm always switching perspectives to whatever detail my mind is tracking next.

Does anyone else experience this strange, always-in-motion kind of visual imagination? I'm guessing it's an autistic thing. I kind of like it, but it hasn't helped with my insomnia.

Parents Reply Children
  • There are very visual ways of understanding mathematics. One of the most beautiful ones for me (not the easiest maybe) is the Pythagorean Theorem proof (or "proof" for very demanding readers):

    Observe that we have two same-size squares, but coloured blocks are in a different order. Because re-arranging the coloured rectangles does not change the total white space (we can not create more white space) then one is forced to conclude that c² =  a² + b² which in words is: the white space on the left equals the sum of the whitespace on the right.

    I am omitting details, but that is the essential step. I hope you like it.

    I would be happy to explain this for hours, so feel free to ask any question. If you'd like to give a book a go, I recommend "The Joy of X" which to a large extent is visual as described above.

    Note also that things like Mandalas, and other symmetric objects are mathematical. If you like symmetry, you like mathematics.

  • I wonder if my always-in-motion images are just my brain's desperate attempt at fixing a still image that keeps failing to hold in place, so my brain replaces it with yet another still image that won't hold in place, and so on. Hence the motion effect. It's also a bit like when you see people dancing under strobe lighting.

    Also, weirdly, the motion effect is so strong that I can sort-of feel the g-forces as I move around it. Kind of like getting pushed into the side of your seat in a car when going around a roundabout ("rotary", for our cousins across the pond). I always feel I'm moving with respect to the image, rather than the other way around.

    So, either everyone visualises things like that and I'm completely normal, or my experience is an outlier. I was hoping maybe to find out which. It's strange that I never noticed it until that "imagine ten stars" thing with the insomnia book last year.