Given the lengthy trial of Lucy Letby and the number of crimes she was accused of committing, can we really take seriously the claims, even from experts in the field, that there is simply no evidence Lucy committed any crimes?
Given the lengthy trial of Lucy Letby and the number of crimes she was accused of committing, can we really take seriously the claims, even from experts in the field, that there is simply no evidence Lucy committed any crimes?
May I respectfully suggest that if some people are genuinely upset by some of the topics under discussion why not simply ignore them? I'm not sure it fair for one or two individuals to stop others right to free speech.
Are you really sure that 'free speech' without thought to the feelings of others is applicable on this forum?
This reminds me of when people complain about certain TV programs they don’t approve of. They don’t have to watch them, yet they also don’t want anyone else to watch them either. There are many things I disapprove of in society, but I don’t expect to dictate how others behave just because I don’t agree with them. Do we really want this forum to discuss nothing more controversial than what everyone’s favourite jam (or even their second favourite jam) is?
#1 Victoria Plum
#2 Bilberry
If curds are allowed then I’ll have cherry curd as my second favourite.
If curds are allowed then I’ll have cherry curd as my second favourite.