Having another child

Firstly this post comes with a disclaimer - my intention is not to offend anyone, but I might do, for which I am sorry.  I dont really have any other place to ask this question.

Our son, although not yet formally diagnosed, is receiving support for a presumed autism diagnosis.  We are pretty much just making plans for him and the actual diagnosis seems pretty much a formality now.

We always talked about having another child after our son - we are both older so we knew it would need to be soon.  Now that we know we are on the path to a diagnosis for him the topic has obviously come up again.

My husband is still keen to have another child.  He points out that although there is every chance that another child might also be on the spectrum, there is every chance that they may not.  He thinks our son would benefit from having a sibling around who would also hopefully be a friend to him when we are gone.

I am scared that our little ones behaviour will change.  He is currently placid, flexible, very easy going - in fact he is wonderful around babies - runs up to give them their dummy back or stroke them if they are crying.  I fear that is going to change at some point down the line and that I may not cope if I have two children with special needs.  Our marriage has already started to show signs of strain.

I'm also afraid of depriving him of attention if he might need it as he gets older, but the thought of no more children fills me with a renewed grief that I didnt expect.

Is there anyone here who has wrestled with this decision?  What did you decide?  How did you decide?  Is there anyone who can tell me if we are likely to have another child on the spectrum so we could make this decision consciously?

Thanks.

Parents
  • SproutsMa said:

    I don't think Kitty02 was being offensive - she was being honest, which after all, was what I asked for.  All opinions welcomed x

    Honest? Yes. Offensive? Also yes, and I believe objectively so. Ive already quoted the single most objectionable line up-thread...the statement "Autistic children get so much worse as they get older" is massively perjorative as for a thing to get worse it has to be, by definition, bad. Do you find the statment "Autistic children are bad" offensive? I also find the line "One Autistic child is a nightmare" to be objectionable but its only a lesser expression of the contempt already displayed. I also think the statement "or worse still, a poor wee normal child caught up with an autistic sibling?" is wildly inappropriate. Is it the posters position that a AS person can only be a destructive force in the lives of their siblings?

    What I am most concerned by however is the covert assumption made in the first paragraph that challenging and violent behaviour are inevitbilities from an AS adolescent. This is not the case. Many posters on this forum can provide anecdotal evidence that conflict between an AS pupil and NT pupils is perpetuated by the NT pupils. Whereas parents and schools properly protect the vulnerable AS child in their care from such, the child is substantially less likely to need to defend himself with violence from intolerable psychological abuse. Kitty02 gives the impression that incidents occuring between her son and other pupils were, in her opinion, exclusively the fault of her son. This parental attitude does genuine damage to the child, as well as precluding a proper parental defence of their childs interests and wellbeing.

Reply
  • SproutsMa said:

    I don't think Kitty02 was being offensive - she was being honest, which after all, was what I asked for.  All opinions welcomed x

    Honest? Yes. Offensive? Also yes, and I believe objectively so. Ive already quoted the single most objectionable line up-thread...the statement "Autistic children get so much worse as they get older" is massively perjorative as for a thing to get worse it has to be, by definition, bad. Do you find the statment "Autistic children are bad" offensive? I also find the line "One Autistic child is a nightmare" to be objectionable but its only a lesser expression of the contempt already displayed. I also think the statement "or worse still, a poor wee normal child caught up with an autistic sibling?" is wildly inappropriate. Is it the posters position that a AS person can only be a destructive force in the lives of their siblings?

    What I am most concerned by however is the covert assumption made in the first paragraph that challenging and violent behaviour are inevitbilities from an AS adolescent. This is not the case. Many posters on this forum can provide anecdotal evidence that conflict between an AS pupil and NT pupils is perpetuated by the NT pupils. Whereas parents and schools properly protect the vulnerable AS child in their care from such, the child is substantially less likely to need to defend himself with violence from intolerable psychological abuse. Kitty02 gives the impression that incidents occuring between her son and other pupils were, in her opinion, exclusively the fault of her son. This parental attitude does genuine damage to the child, as well as precluding a proper parental defence of their childs interests and wellbeing.

Children
No Data