I’m so Angry! (Rant Alert)

I attended a College meeting today to discuss the lack of provision for my son, who formally had a Statement, but now has an LDA (Learning Disability Assessment.)

Despite having a detailed LDA and attending pre-start meetings to ensure smooth transition and adequate support for my sons needs at College, little has been implemented to the point where he didn’t even have a computer until December last, by which time he was 4 months into the course yet had already been ‘dropped down’ a level, from level 3 Diploma to level 2 Diploma, because it was perceived he could not cope.

He required a laptop (On loan) with two specific soft-ware programs that had been identified as needed to enable him to access education, plus the use of a Dictaphone to record the lectures, but was told by the level 3 tutor he wasn’t allowed to use the Dictaphone in class and had no way of recording his work due to the lack of Auxiliary aids prescribed.

My son has High functioning ASD, Severe Dyslexia and fine motor difficulties, yet has already managed to attain decent grades in his GCSE’s (5 A-C grades including Math) at School and a level 2 extended certificate at a Merit level,  following the use of the above mentioned support in the past.

Yet when this was essentially refused him in his new College course environment he couldn’t access the course and was summarily dropped down firstly by a diploma level and then again to a certificate level, still with no support.                                                                                                                    Repeated requests to the College for review meetings to discuss our concerns and address the situation were just ignored.

Only after I put in a request to see the principle was an appointment suddenly made available. By this time we are 9 months into the course!

The meeting I attended today was extremely patronizing. My son was praised for attaining a level 2 Certificate at Distinction in his current studies and asked to come back for another year to do a level 2 Diploma in September.

I’m not sure the College really appreciate where my sons complaint lies. He already has a level 2 extended certificate. No one in our household is at all surprized he’s managed to attain what he has (A distinction) because it’s not at the level commensurate with his ability. He wanted a Diploma at level 3 or 2, but was prevented from obtaining it because he didn’t have the right tools!

Now he will have to do an extra year, to obtain a Diploma at level 2 before he can even consider level 3.

I’ve spoken to a number of parents and students recently who have had exactly the same experience and frankly , It Sucks!

Why are Colleges being so closed about those on the spectrum or indeed anyone with special needs? The knee jerk reaction is to drop them down a level rather than provide them with the tools for independent learning or access to education!

My son didn’t want a reader or scribe sitting next to him, he just wanted access to learning independently and at a level commensurate with his intelligence and ability. All of which is considered a reasonable adjustment to ensure a disabled pupil is not at a substantial disadvantage in comparison with a non-disabled pupil, under the equality Act 2010 and yet, denied him.

It’s left my son completely demoralized. In fact, I doubt he will return to education any time soon.

For my son, it’s clearly too late and he’s now become a NEET. Given the patronizing tone of the meeting today, I’m not sure whether much would be obtained by making a formal complaint to the College, and yet part of me realizes that if someone doesn’t Stand up and shout, it leaves hoards of students still in the trap of demoralising education, slower than necessary progress and with the potential threat of joining the long line of NEETS lining up behind my son,  looming ever larger!

If You Judge a Fish by Its Ability to Climb a Tree, It Will Live Its Whole Life Believing that It is Stupid. Now’s the time to ditch the prejudice!

It’s time for the colleges to change their poor practices, Stop the demoralization of those with SEN, to ditch the prejudice and to support every student to reach their true potential.

Parents
  • Odd things can happen in order to close a module. If a piece of work is outstanding (not submitted or not submitted to requirements) and it isn't necessary to do it to complete the module (eg 40% pass minimum met), but only to satisfy the paperwork, I could conceive some sort of fudge might be applied.

    But what you describe seems odd to me. Sometimes if an assignment was group work, and depended on one of the group doing the data processing and the others using the data for some element of individual work, if this needed to be completed to satisfy the record, a student might legitimately be asked to copy some working to meet the minimum. Or if a student couldn't do the work for some legitimate reason, the completion of part of it in this way might be justified. But it is not good practice.

    The important issue here is that no-one should submit work not his own for assessment, and that includes plagiarism. So your son has been persuaded to do something wrong, but as long as there's no risk to him in having complied with this strange instruction, and it is just them filling gaps, just go along with it. My worry would be if questions subsequently arose implying plagiarism. Are they getting him to do something they can then use against him - eg to get him off the course?  I would advise consulting a solicitor about what has happened and to cover your son and yourself.

    Now the signing off on SEN support he didn't get. I'm gravely concerned this has been done, but unless your son is identified as a vulnerable adult, if your son signed it there's not much can be done. You should complain to the principal of the college about any impropriety, but the problem is proving it. At the very least consult a solicitor. You need proper legal advice on this - don't leave it to chance.

    If it was a case of "water under the bridge" and they were clearing the books and making a fresh start you could ignore it, but I don't think you can. I just don't see how you can prove it as malpractice if they play on your son's word/compliance.

    The college in question is clearly a moral disgrace. But the deed is done as your son has complied. They've covered themselves by doing this, purely in their own selfish interests, and not in the spirit that they exist to fulfil. How this can go on is beyond me.

    We seem to be caught between Michael Gove and David Willets where FE is concerned, and I think that with all the restructuring of everything FE colleges have been allowed irrational laxity. But who is to blame, I don't know.

    But until something is done about the truly rotten state of FE Colleges I don't know of a way forward. NAS Moderators please look at this issue.

    If your son is leaving the college anyway, do you feel you can afford to name and shame them on here?

    What you are describing is a bent college......  How's that possible with so-called regulation and standards.... What a sad mess this country is in.

Reply
  • Odd things can happen in order to close a module. If a piece of work is outstanding (not submitted or not submitted to requirements) and it isn't necessary to do it to complete the module (eg 40% pass minimum met), but only to satisfy the paperwork, I could conceive some sort of fudge might be applied.

    But what you describe seems odd to me. Sometimes if an assignment was group work, and depended on one of the group doing the data processing and the others using the data for some element of individual work, if this needed to be completed to satisfy the record, a student might legitimately be asked to copy some working to meet the minimum. Or if a student couldn't do the work for some legitimate reason, the completion of part of it in this way might be justified. But it is not good practice.

    The important issue here is that no-one should submit work not his own for assessment, and that includes plagiarism. So your son has been persuaded to do something wrong, but as long as there's no risk to him in having complied with this strange instruction, and it is just them filling gaps, just go along with it. My worry would be if questions subsequently arose implying plagiarism. Are they getting him to do something they can then use against him - eg to get him off the course?  I would advise consulting a solicitor about what has happened and to cover your son and yourself.

    Now the signing off on SEN support he didn't get. I'm gravely concerned this has been done, but unless your son is identified as a vulnerable adult, if your son signed it there's not much can be done. You should complain to the principal of the college about any impropriety, but the problem is proving it. At the very least consult a solicitor. You need proper legal advice on this - don't leave it to chance.

    If it was a case of "water under the bridge" and they were clearing the books and making a fresh start you could ignore it, but I don't think you can. I just don't see how you can prove it as malpractice if they play on your son's word/compliance.

    The college in question is clearly a moral disgrace. But the deed is done as your son has complied. They've covered themselves by doing this, purely in their own selfish interests, and not in the spirit that they exist to fulfil. How this can go on is beyond me.

    We seem to be caught between Michael Gove and David Willets where FE is concerned, and I think that with all the restructuring of everything FE colleges have been allowed irrational laxity. But who is to blame, I don't know.

    But until something is done about the truly rotten state of FE Colleges I don't know of a way forward. NAS Moderators please look at this issue.

    If your son is leaving the college anyway, do you feel you can afford to name and shame them on here?

    What you are describing is a bent college......  How's that possible with so-called regulation and standards.... What a sad mess this country is in.

Children
No Data