World War Three? Or summit else?

Covid was a silent version of World War 3 so the coming war should more correctly be referred to as World War 4 - given the current geopolitical state of the world and with many parts of the world being in conflict (by design) a nuke war is an assured certainty and is inevitable, even if Putin is taken out - today’s generation of nuke weapons are far more powerful than even the Cold War, where they can burrow several hundred feet into the ground before detonation, making underground bunkers useless as a means of survival - and by the same token, if a nuke warhead hits a volcano, they trigger an eruption of a previously dormant volcano, if they hit a fault line, they trigger an earthquake, if this fault line is undersea, it triggers a tidal wave of hundreds of feet, extending for hundreds of miles inland, all of which is a truly terrifying possibility - aside from Russia and CCP China (who will change its nuke policies on a dime if it is to their advantage) there are many other nuke nations hostile to the west who don’t need any prompting from Russia or CCP China to take a pop at the West and who will not hesitate to launch their nukes at the West, even if they don’t feel threatened themselves - if even a short range nuke is fired across the borders of any other nation, this means that no nation on earth can ever again truly call themselves neutral, such as Ireland, Switzerland and Austria - the very fact that the U.K. holds NATO/US nukes on U.K. soil and has Royal Navy ships and submarines and RAF aircraft carrying nukes, turns the U.K. into a prime target for nuke attacks - starting in 2025 onward and for the remainder of my own life, the U.K. is in grave danger of a nuke attack and this cannot be avoided, as the leaders of many hostile nuke nations are very mentally unstable, have serious cases of NPD and cannot be reasoned with, they are blinded by deep hatred for the West - my only hope is that the US Star Wars nuke defence system is fully operational to intercept and destroy any launched nukes when they are still in outer space before they reach the west 

We lost our backbone, once America entered the fray. The past Eighty Years were spent conceding ground, in the name of a 'Special Relationship'. And, now, we're soft targets.

Now America is trying to defend the traditional role of Men; having undermined that role for the past seven decades. It's all face-saving. And trying to prop up their fallen Empire.

I actually feel sorry for the Refugees. They don't seem to be aware of what they're being used for; by the Globalists.

Desmond1979 said:

We lost our backbone, once America entered the fray. The past Eighty Years were spent conceding ground, in the name of a 'Special Relationship'.

To be fair, we lost it post WW1 when they more or less bankrupt the empire. WW2 meant going so deep into debt that it took generations to pay it off and we were always only a shadow of the imperial monster we once were.

When you look at what the empire did at its peak - the nations we subjigated, the rape of natural resources and atrocities committed in the name of the Empire then it is probably a good thing that it fell.

Read the history books if you dare - the Empire would have matched Darth Vaders plans if it were set in a different era.

Iain, Rome was a failing state before Christianity was adopted, there were so many rebellions, so many emporors only lasted a few months. Britain was a failed state long before the official legionary exit date of 410 CE.

A lot of the current trouble in the middle east is due to colonialism, at the end of WWs1 and 2 the Allies carved up territories on a map, without regard to natural boundaries like rivers of mountain ranges, let alone the lands that peoples had traditionally lived in and basically made new countries and installed leaders who were compliant with western aims. The same happened in Africa too, look at a map anytime you see a straight line denoting a border, then you're looking at at something created by someone with a map and a ruler.

History needs revising, I remember when we were being taught that peoples didn't move beyong their modern political boundaries, not only were those boundaries and countries not in existance at the time, but why should people be still? Why has it taken so long for it to be recognised that the Vikings "discovered" America and not Christpher Columbus? So much of what we call history is a set of excuses to justify slavery, colonialism, asset stripping and a whole load more abuses, the consequenses of which we're still living with.

I do get where you're coming from about, I presume, reparations to countries exploited by European Empires. I think one of the issues is that of class, working class British people saw very little of the benefits of empire and that isn't recognised by our former colonies, I think a more honest conversation is needed. As for things like the Elgin Marbles,why not make copies and give them back? It's not like we can't make brilliant copies of things now, nor is it like a lot of what we see in museums aren't copies anyway with the originals being to fragile to go on display.

Iain, Rome was a failing state before Christianity was adopted, there were so many rebellions, so many emporors only lasted a few months. Britain was a failed state long before the official legionary exit date of 410 CE.

A lot of the current trouble in the middle east is due to colonialism, at the end of WWs1 and 2 the Allies carved up territories on a map, without regard to natural boundaries like rivers of mountain ranges, let alone the lands that peoples had traditionally lived in and basically made new countries and installed leaders who were compliant with western aims. The same happened in Africa too, look at a map anytime you see a straight line denoting a border, then you're looking at at something created by someone with a map and a ruler.

History needs revising, I remember when we were being taught that peoples didn't move beyong their modern political boundaries, not only were those boundaries and countries not in existance at the time, but why should people be still? Why has it taken so long for it to be recognised that the Vikings "discovered" America and not Christpher Columbus? So much of what we call history is a set of excuses to justify slavery, colonialism, asset stripping and a whole load more abuses, the consequenses of which we're still living with.

I do get where you're coming from about, I presume, reparations to countries exploited by European Empires. I think one of the issues is that of class, working class British people saw very little of the benefits of empire and that isn't recognised by our former colonies, I think a more honest conversation is needed. As for things like the Elgin Marbles,why not make copies and give them back? It's not like we can't make brilliant copies of things now, nor is it like a lot of what we see in museums aren't copies anyway with the originals being to fragile to go on display.