• Replies 18 replies
  • Subscribers 28 subscribers
  • Views 9683 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

help with pre-school booster

spoons78

Hi all, im new to the community forum so i hope im using it correctly! I am having real problems trying to decide whether or not to give my 4 year old son his pre school booster. He has always shown signs of autism since birth really but after his first mmr injections he lost all his speech and stopped eating, and for years has only eaten a handfull of different foods. Now he is at school and he is coming on so well. He is eating hot food for the first time in years, im starting to hold little converations with him, and he isnt half as frustrated as he used to be. I know people do have strong views on this so any advice or eperience with this i would gladly appreciate and take on board. I personally think there is a link, but i also acept the importance of immunisation but there are many people i know with autistic children that have not opted to give the pre school booster, for fear of regression, and also rightly stating that this is merely a "top up" and its highly likely thats its unnecessary anyway. I am changing my mind daily, so please, any help or advice you can give would be most welcomed.

many thanks for reading

liz :)

Parents

  • With regards to the triple MMR and other vaccinations given to children - we seem to be missing the point somewhat. All or most testing into whether these are good or bad come from firms or related firms being paid by the makers of these vaccines. That's akin to Pepsi paying a company to investigate if their drinks are bad for your teeth or not. The governments own advice and warnings also come from these so called tests. The real issue here is the mercury used in administering these jabs and the effects on an already developing childs immune system. Neither can be classed as good for them in any way shape or form. We do definitely need immunising from certain diseases such as measles which can not only be deadly but has the added ability to wipe out all previous immunitity to other diseases built up prior to contracting it. The immunisation brought into fight Polio came too late and the polio cases had dropped dramatically just before immunisation was brought in so the jury was out on that in any case. The main theme is that non-immunised children are a danger to immunised children - not true - this is an outright lie - how can a child that is supposedly immunised against somethiing - then go and catch it from a child that hasn't been? No one seems to think of this yet it is brought up over and over again. My son is diagnosed as autistic and I do not think it was a result of the jabs he received - yet I do think that it has hindered his progress and mercury in these jabs has a toxicity that is unheard of and is very difficult to remove from the body. Beware of so-called experts telling us what is right and what is wrong. What is needed is true impartial testing and if parents wnat seperate immunisations - the excuse that they "might forget" is just not a realistic argument at all - there is no reason why they cannot choose to have the jabs separately at all. It all seems a bit fishy that they are forced to do this. They are our children and we should be given the choice - not forced by a state to infect our children with dangerous toxins.

Reply

  • With regards to the triple MMR and other vaccinations given to children - we seem to be missing the point somewhat. All or most testing into whether these are good or bad come from firms or related firms being paid by the makers of these vaccines. That's akin to Pepsi paying a company to investigate if their drinks are bad for your teeth or not. The governments own advice and warnings also come from these so called tests. The real issue here is the mercury used in administering these jabs and the effects on an already developing childs immune system. Neither can be classed as good for them in any way shape or form. We do definitely need immunising from certain diseases such as measles which can not only be deadly but has the added ability to wipe out all previous immunitity to other diseases built up prior to contracting it. The immunisation brought into fight Polio came too late and the polio cases had dropped dramatically just before immunisation was brought in so the jury was out on that in any case. The main theme is that non-immunised children are a danger to immunised children - not true - this is an outright lie - how can a child that is supposedly immunised against somethiing - then go and catch it from a child that hasn't been? No one seems to think of this yet it is brought up over and over again. My son is diagnosed as autistic and I do not think it was a result of the jabs he received - yet I do think that it has hindered his progress and mercury in these jabs has a toxicity that is unheard of and is very difficult to remove from the body. Beware of so-called experts telling us what is right and what is wrong. What is needed is true impartial testing and if parents wnat seperate immunisations - the excuse that they "might forget" is just not a realistic argument at all - there is no reason why they cannot choose to have the jabs separately at all. It all seems a bit fishy that they are forced to do this. They are our children and we should be given the choice - not forced by a state to infect our children with dangerous toxins.

Children
No Data