Frankley I'm disgusted by the NAS (wait for the Censorship)

I contacted the NAS wanting help as an adult who has been diagnosed with aspergers and now 34.

After a shambles of an advice line that to be totally honest was a waste of time after over a week of trying to get in contact with 2 people doing one persons job.

City Road Address and yet there is no call queue system and two part time people doing one persons job- shows how little they really want non residential people.

I receive direct payments and with the NAS allegedly championing Aspergers

(it seems to get donations) I expected that I would get some support and advice, not fobbed off to Citizens Advice.

Unhappy with what frankly I think comes close to fraud collecting donations from people believing they are donating to Autism/Aspergers Charity and yet when I have a dire situation-they couldn't care less.

I contacted a certain professor and he kindly offered to pass my experiences onto Mark Lever for me and has been a most pleasant person to chat via email to.

I'd hoped that there was some misunderstanding and a professor contacting the chief exec would result in some further contact and assistance.

But no, I had my carer's assistance to visit citizens advice and now have a dreadfully slow solicitor involved- but at least they listened and provided help.

I have also asked my MP to help and been told that they would intervene on my behalf.

So the net result as a documented Adult with written Diagnosis of Asperger hoping for help from the NAS- Nothing and for me the most shocking part of this is the fact that those less able than myself will have nowhere to turn to.

So I've reported the NAS to the charities commission- doubt much will happen

I fully expect the thread to get deleted- but then again it will only confirm that the NAS want people's money and Adults in Care in the community are left with no Support.

Thank You for NOTHING

Parents
  • I will send an email explaining the situation in greater detail, but in a nutshell for people reading this thread.

    I have a full written diagnosis going back years ago,I have the NHS partnerships own notes that candid entries show they knew they were creating undesirable situations and failed to either investigate staff training or make any attempt to rectify area's they recognised to be highly unsatisfactory.

    Both the Disability Law Service and Citizens advice agree there is more than enough evidence that the nhs partnership acted unlawfully.

    Now consider the fact that the chief executive  say's the situation isn't resolvable locally, only after I complained in 2012 after years of highlighting the short commings-I suddenly get there specialist aspergers team wanting to be involved.

    The specialist aspergers team has existed since 2005, so why when I have a written diagnosis since 1990's have I only heard about them in 2012!

    So chief executive refuses to discuss/accept any short commings locally,but having a long standing diagnosis and a specialists letter from hospital stating my ill health.

    As a last poker move knowing they had nothing to offer, I have proof of key worker telling lies and canceling my direct payments.

    Forced to attend while ill with an advocate, they sent a social worker that didn't know the facts listed above and key worker didn't turn up.

    An OT assessment was done and the second appontment was then cancelled, when the chief exec refuses to attend to short commings and says nothing on offer-  I believe that the meeting was designed to catch me ill and create an alleged uncooperative allegation-I've video'd it and CQC aware.

    MP also less than impressed and said will help.

    All I found was NAS didn't want to know, so if it has taken me years to get verified evidence of NHS abusive relationship and also an illegal Direct Payments scam operating according to DLS.

    Not once did NAS champion my cause and show interest,I got a better response from a kind professor who offered to pass on comments to Mark Lever.

    I have of course heard nothing 

Reply
  • I will send an email explaining the situation in greater detail, but in a nutshell for people reading this thread.

    I have a full written diagnosis going back years ago,I have the NHS partnerships own notes that candid entries show they knew they were creating undesirable situations and failed to either investigate staff training or make any attempt to rectify area's they recognised to be highly unsatisfactory.

    Both the Disability Law Service and Citizens advice agree there is more than enough evidence that the nhs partnership acted unlawfully.

    Now consider the fact that the chief executive  say's the situation isn't resolvable locally, only after I complained in 2012 after years of highlighting the short commings-I suddenly get there specialist aspergers team wanting to be involved.

    The specialist aspergers team has existed since 2005, so why when I have a written diagnosis since 1990's have I only heard about them in 2012!

    So chief executive refuses to discuss/accept any short commings locally,but having a long standing diagnosis and a specialists letter from hospital stating my ill health.

    As a last poker move knowing they had nothing to offer, I have proof of key worker telling lies and canceling my direct payments.

    Forced to attend while ill with an advocate, they sent a social worker that didn't know the facts listed above and key worker didn't turn up.

    An OT assessment was done and the second appontment was then cancelled, when the chief exec refuses to attend to short commings and says nothing on offer-  I believe that the meeting was designed to catch me ill and create an alleged uncooperative allegation-I've video'd it and CQC aware.

    MP also less than impressed and said will help.

    All I found was NAS didn't want to know, so if it has taken me years to get verified evidence of NHS abusive relationship and also an illegal Direct Payments scam operating according to DLS.

    Not once did NAS champion my cause and show interest,I got a better response from a kind professor who offered to pass on comments to Mark Lever.

    I have of course heard nothing 

Children
No Data