Hello

It took me about six hours to write the "hello" because it seemed so excessive, like royal icing on a fruit cake - the contents are rich enough without all the sugary faff of smalltalk on top.

Anyway.

I was recently diagnosed with ASD as an adult after relationship troubles.  Now I am told that my worldview is not to be relied on in emotional matters and I am left with my internal voice telling me x about a situation and my internalised voice telling my that x is probably false.  This has meant that if I feel hurt in a situation now I no longer know if my hurt is justified, and any counterclaim that it is just my ASD is irresistable.  I don't even know if what I have just written has any merit as an emotional standpoint.

I do realise that I have the emotional maturity of a 16-18 year old; I make those kind of mistakes and am that sort of reckless.  This is problematic because my (a) ASD is as it were subject to an inverse square law: it manifests itself at noticeable levels only at relatively great proximity (b) I am quite successful, first as a professional, now as an author (c) I have the Peter Pan quality i.e. not only do I look quite good for my age but I pursue my interests with a childlike joy which I can see is infectious from afar.  This means that I seem to attract people, but what is frightening is I don't see it until things have gone too far and then I become a rabbit in the headlights.

This is the thing that makes it difficult to explain to people who say "but you're normal".  Yes, I can do most things well if not excellently, but if you get beyond the usual social barriers (that I lack) then I am as misleadable as a child.  My therapist has basically advised me not to be alone with anyone I do not absolutely trust.

Whereas before I adopted the philosophy of ploughing headlong into the present, having concluded that everyone else seems to waste time that could be spent adding to the beauty of the world, I am now starting my notional GCSE on "human emotional needs and communication".  I must say I was astonished to learn that people speak with their eyes - I have started trying to look at them now (but it's very hard).

What I have also come to understand better is how my emotions fit into this equation.  I have never in my mind been an emotionless robot (tautology I know) but it seems I come across that way unless I am discuss my interest.  I always told myself that if people knew how much I truly felt they would understand, but the revelation would be too terrible for them.  A kind of mystical exceptionalism; is it that I feel more than an NT could possibly bear, or do they bear the same emotional quantity with ease?  Across the spectrum of so-called meltdowns I have not had many that I would have quaified as more than vicious anger, but the one or two extrema have been singular.  Either way, I can see how I deal with my anxiety and where I physically lock it into my body, how I can release it and manage it, and how I can develop techniques for controlled release that allow tentative examination of emotional states for what they are (rather than the binary placid-volcano which has to date characterised me).

I am hoping that this subjective practice could inform and be informed by the objectivity of human relations in which I engage myself, but as I said at the very beginning I am placed in a position in which doubt has become hyperbolic: how can I learn if my hypotheses about emotional situations are wrong a priori?  This seems to place me in the position of being utterly reliant on another, being criticised for this reliance, only to be criticised when I strike out on my own. I think I would feel better if a third party umpire - a counsellor - were involved at this stage just to assure me that some of my standpoints are indeed daft (or not).  At the moment I do not have sufficient first principles even from which to work.

That fire inside of me - and I know that this fire is even there when it has consumed the me I think I am - drives my best work.  I love this image of the Seraphim as self-consuming balls of flame closest to the light; I can get this close when I write sometimes though it is exhausting.  Yet I also realise how much this flame I stoke draws oxygen from those around me and how determinately I suck emotional life from the closest.

I am trying to reciprocate now, but every effort of donation is like cutting flesh.  Every moment of "being there for someone" I willingly give but it means opening up that which I have spent my life burying deep, baring the raw wound of my existence to the salt of tears.

Let them cleanse and heal.

Parents
  • Thank you for this advice.

    I have been putting some of this into practice with quite a bit of communication, even if it does feel as if I am being guided around a room blindfolded.  That is to say, a lot more things need to be explained to achieve a workable result and that sounds strange but it helps a great deal.  For example, I am very conscious of how all this supposition can quickly fall into paranoia (which I avoided before by not even asking the questions) and that this can be alleviated simply by asking questions and receiving patient responses.

    It is simply that I find myself in a position constituted on the basis of a false prospectus.  False but not deliberately so.  Would I be where I am now if everyone had known all the facts, but, more to the point, now that we are all here, we are all standing on ground knowing in a certain sense that some people have been "tricked" and others have made a conscious decision based on an inappropriate reasoning - one they realise is inappropiate even for them.

    There is a certain tragedy about it, a revelation of the powerlessness of the characters before their own nature.

Reply
  • Thank you for this advice.

    I have been putting some of this into practice with quite a bit of communication, even if it does feel as if I am being guided around a room blindfolded.  That is to say, a lot more things need to be explained to achieve a workable result and that sounds strange but it helps a great deal.  For example, I am very conscious of how all this supposition can quickly fall into paranoia (which I avoided before by not even asking the questions) and that this can be alleviated simply by asking questions and receiving patient responses.

    It is simply that I find myself in a position constituted on the basis of a false prospectus.  False but not deliberately so.  Would I be where I am now if everyone had known all the facts, but, more to the point, now that we are all here, we are all standing on ground knowing in a certain sense that some people have been "tricked" and others have made a conscious decision based on an inappropriate reasoning - one they realise is inappropiate even for them.

    There is a certain tragedy about it, a revelation of the powerlessness of the characters before their own nature.

Children
No Data