how would you re-organise the school curriculum, to teach life skills?

As it’s too hot to do anything practical, I’ve been thinking [arrgh, look out Open mouth]. If education was based on, ‘how to live a fulfilling life’, instead of passing obscure exams, perhaps many of society’s problems might self-resolve over time. It seems to me that many problems are simply cries for help from unhappy people (not only kids) who don’t know how to get from a) to b).

I had, ‘unfortunate’ [ergo, hopeless] parents who taught me nothing, except not to ask questions [ergo, questions resulted in cold silence, black looks or argument!]. By the time I left school, I had no idea:

  • how to run a house or bank account, let alone go about finding either

  • what ‘career’ meant and how you knew which job you might enjoy and be good at

  • the meaning of love/relationship – how you found a suitable life partner; tediously expressed by peers as, ‘the one’ - as if some kind of Messiah!

  • how to be successful, i.e. exemplified by the glittering gods / goddesses in the culture pages.

  • In the absence of faith, how to be moral and avoid immorality, also to know the difference

Yes, I had a string of O levels and 2 A levels, but what use was the history of world religions, formula for quadratic equations, how to use a Bunsen burner or the gory battles of Attila the Hun? I would rather have learned the difference between capital and interest; how to cook a meal from scratch; how to budget and make a shopping list; how to avoid vexatious or tedious people; and most of all, how to be happy.

What sort of education would you have liked? How would you like to be taught? How would you organise a curriculum based on practical life skills?

Parents
  • I think schools and education haven't changed a great deal in decades, and now they have to.

    There is little point teaching every aspect of the curriculum to everyone. The traditional model of education, followed by work and then retirement, may no longer be relevant.

    I suspect the days of huge numbers of people taking on large student loans are coming to an end. Universities may become more selective again. Unemployment could rise significantly as we adapt to a world where perhaps only a quarter of the people who work today are needed, while the population continues to grow and people have much more leisure time.

    That means we may need to shift away from expecting everyone to slog away for 40–50 years and instead provide some form of minimum income for all, although I'm not sure exactly how that would be funded.

    As for education, if we reduce some of the less useful parts of the curriculum, schools could at least ensure everyone leaves with basic literacy and numeracy skills. Why do so many pupils still leave school unable to read or write properly? Beyond that, individuals should have more freedom to decide what they want to learn.

    For many people, self-teaching may become the norm rather than the spoon-fed approach our schools are currently based on.  And maybe some of them - do that on what they need to know - which I expect will be focused on life-skills 

  • as we adapt to a world where perhaps only a quarter of the people who work today are needed
    provide some form of minimum income for all,

    Yes, that would be a good solution - if a way could be found, it would need to be perceived less as paying 'benefits' and more a, 'basic wage' - this is less humiliating for the recipient, giving dignity and purpose. There would need to be ways of 'occupying' people - cheap or free purposeful activity including elements of learning, 'hobby' /interest/ , exercise, community, campaigning - some positives that encourage people to join in. 

    For many people, self-teaching may become the norm

    Great idea too, perhaps with some kind of 'course' guidance provided by experts. Again, adult education and activity were the first things to be ditched when money was tight, but I'm sure reintroducing such things would be cost-effective in reducing crime and anti social behaviours.

Reply
  • as we adapt to a world where perhaps only a quarter of the people who work today are needed
    provide some form of minimum income for all,

    Yes, that would be a good solution - if a way could be found, it would need to be perceived less as paying 'benefits' and more a, 'basic wage' - this is less humiliating for the recipient, giving dignity and purpose. There would need to be ways of 'occupying' people - cheap or free purposeful activity including elements of learning, 'hobby' /interest/ , exercise, community, campaigning - some positives that encourage people to join in. 

    For many people, self-teaching may become the norm

    Great idea too, perhaps with some kind of 'course' guidance provided by experts. Again, adult education and activity were the first things to be ditched when money was tight, but I'm sure reintroducing such things would be cost-effective in reducing crime and anti social behaviours.

Children
  • I think UBI is inevitable, the issue will be getting the tech companies, who's products are doing away with humans to pay for it. It's not acceptable that they make so much money and individuals make so much money and pay so little tax, have so little concern for everybody else and hide behind international tax havens to avoid their responsibilites.

    I went to a secondary modern and I wouldn't wish that failed excuse for an education on anyone, can someone please explain to me why bringing a pair of tights to school to hand wash was a "life lesson"? We had baby dolls to wash and change too, dolls always freaked me out, still do, I'd run screaming from one in a way I wouldn't do with a real baby, one of the things I noticed was how gendered these lessons were, we got to do laundry and play with big dolls and the boys, in the school opposite us got to do carpentry and metalwork, would young people have the choice now or would we still be silo'd by gender?

    I think changing how we teach, how we think of schooling and certainly how schools are run should be changed. Uniforms is one of my bugbears, schools say they want to foster individuality, but the first thing they do is make everyone look the same. I don't buy the argument that nobody knows who's rich and who's poor, kids heads don't do up at the back, it's all given away with a hundred small details, what bag you have, how clean you are, what you eat, if you eat, your accent, what car you arrive at school in, what jobs your parents do, if any and what sort of house and street you live in.

    I think one of the things thats really confusing is the insistance on fostering individualism, whilst at the same time wanting everyone to be a team player and basically think the same things. Do teachers really like getting 30 different versions of thier own lecture note back when pupils hand work in? Do they not welcome some originality, when properly researched and backed up by evidence? I think some teachers actually do want 30 different versions of thier own lecture notes because then they don't have to think, this was something I encountered whilst doing an access course, our psychology lecturer's went mental when is adults actually brought our own experiences into our work, despite being asked to do so. Universtiy lecturers loved it?

    I wonder if we infantalise learning to much? Do we take the joy out of it? How many Shakespeare lovers, still can;t watch the play they had to study for an Englsh exam. I think we should allow people to choose more of what they are interested in, rather than torture everybody with things we hate and can't do. Obviously this should happen along side the basics, but maybe if people were allowed independent study they would find the basics such as maths more interesting.

    Marianne, whilst I'm sure you might never have used your religion O level directly, did you not learn anything from it thats helped you in later life? Research and some critical thinking maybe?