AI replies

Hi I have noticed on here that sometimes someone will reply with what looks like a very AI response to someone’s question. Initially the message looks kind and understanding, but after a while it seems obvious to me that it’s AI. (As someone who has tried Chat GPT a few times). I am wondering if people might use it to put a ‘good’ reply to a thread on here? And genuinely mean well, or if it’s just weird? It makes me feel uncomfortable that might just be me though. 

Parents
  • Having read another discussion on this forum about the use of AI to respond I've come to a couple of conclusions. 

    1. It's not ok if the post you submit is not your ideas and if it's some AI wording ok but I hate it all being AI wording.

    AI 'slop' can enter what you say but it's said in a confident way by the AI.

    2.  AI replies make me feel duped if I eventually realise they aren't human.

    As I talked about in this thread a member of my family only corresponds with me via AI and I find it bizarre and deeply unnerving especially in light of his history of psychosis and being sectioned.

    We are human and I hope that the vast majority of us want to be confident that we are talking to other humans directly. 

  • AI replies make me feel duped if I eventually realise they aren't human

    Yes! Duped is the word to describe how I felt. 

    I can only imagine how it must feel to have a family member correspondent in such a way. I wouldn’t have confidence over their intentions in the moment and that is how I feel about all AI posts.

  • that is how I feel about all AI posts.

    I loathe recreational AI (LLM stuff/images) with a passion partly generated by environmental concerns and partly the way it bolsters the wealth of amoral tech billionaires. For those reasons, I sold all my stock in a tech fund and have never touched AI voluntarily. However, the dicussion about it on this forum makes me uncomfortably aware that I wouldn't know how to tell the difference between AI slop and something genuinely written by some humans.

  • So, I don’t think it’s fair to dismiss AI too readily, as it definitely has its value - you just have to use it with due caution.

    I think AI is achieving some valuable results in science. I just view its recreational value as massively outweighed by its destructiveness.

  • A narrative from a real person allows their character to show through. AI can’t do that.

    Another good point that disturbs me when I read it.

  • I have to say that, yes, AI can’t always be relied on and often takes things out of context. However, despite those reservations, I’ve found that when chatting with my particular AI model (Copilot), it’s incredibly insightful and helpful about autistic behavior, and very comforting when it simply tries to clarify why I’ve had these problems. It also seems to remember things, as it sometimes refers back to past discussions that relate to the current point under discussion. So, I don’t think it’s fair to dismiss AI too readily, as it definitely has its value - you just have to use it with due caution.

Reply
  • I have to say that, yes, AI can’t always be relied on and often takes things out of context. However, despite those reservations, I’ve found that when chatting with my particular AI model (Copilot), it’s incredibly insightful and helpful about autistic behavior, and very comforting when it simply tries to clarify why I’ve had these problems. It also seems to remember things, as it sometimes refers back to past discussions that relate to the current point under discussion. So, I don’t think it’s fair to dismiss AI too readily, as it definitely has its value - you just have to use it with due caution.

Children