Managing Shutdowns

I always liken a shutdown to someone with a garden that has got out of control.  There comes a point where it gets more out of control no matter how much effort was put in, there are just not enough hours in the day to get it back in order.  So what then happens is that nothing is done.  The only real answer is to start everything again, clear every thing and go back to square one.

This to me is my shutdown.  So many demands put on me, when I know I should finish a job off but then am told to do something else.  So evenutally, the work has built up ... and no matter what it gets worse.  So evenutally, I get to the point I do nothing.  Shutdown and not only in the set task but in other parts of my life as well, even things I get enjoyment from.  And to get it back into order is very difficult, not an easy process.  Too many demands, and not feeling in control causes overload.  Overload means anxiety.  Anxiety causes meltdown and shutdown, not necessarily in that order.  So for want of ever more being required means that the result in the end is nothing is done.

Managers at work tend to think this is something I am doing on purpose.  Yet it is a problem that is caused by their ever increasing demands over things that I am not allowed my control over.  Managers seem incapable of listening, usually they think there i some sort of training that can make everything better.  They seem to think that counselling is the answer to anxiety, rather than removing the cause of the anxiety.  Problems are created in the modern way of living by having too many conflicting demands, too many officials, not enough understanding and too much contol by others.

I have said before on the forums here that problems for autistic people are often caused by the demands of society.  I can certainly work in my own way far more efficiently.  Being Autistic I work by the 'division of labout' method, it is far more efficient.  And unfortunately many managers, especially in the service industry do not understand this.

Another thing I often liken myself to is that of is a caged animal.  We have got a lot more understanding these days of the results of putting animals into unnatural environments.  The animal when caged does not behave naturally.  It paces around, is obviously distressed and can get very bad tempered.  If animals must be held in captivity (and I do accept that a lot of zoological gardens do a good job in conservation such as Chester and Whipsnade) then the environment should create conditions that are as near as possible to the conditions they would find in their own natural homes.

Yet we treat people in this manner and expect them to behave rationally and normally.by neurotypical standards.  The work environment in  by my case seems like a cage.  I do not feel as if I can act naturally and this obviously has repercussions both on me and others.  The whole structure of a work environment is unnatural.  It has come about from the need to control others.  I know I am totally unmanageable, that I work better when left to my own devices, that if I am given an objective rather than an instruction I will work far better.  But this does not fit in with the neurotylipical world.

I agree that the Equality Act should include Autism as a disability.  Myself, I am getting some 'reasonable adjustments' at work and this is welcome.

Unfortunately, it does not go far enough.  As Autism is 'invisible', many people refuse to acknowledge it is causing a problem.  Even a lot of autistic people refuse to concede they are 'disabled'.  To be covered in the workplace, one must prove that it has a 'significant effect' on day to day living.  Now this should be easy, unfortunately there is a lot of opinion as to what is or what is not a significant effect.

Then there is the problem of diagnosis.  Even when diagnosed a lot of people think that so and so's autism is only mild or is not severe enough.  Myself I had great difficulty at work, I was referred to occupational health on three occasions before they finally conceded I had problems.  And problems I do have as a neurotypical would consider although I would not think they are a problem for me.  They do affect my everyday life, I will not go out to a meal for instance and do not socialise with others, I am quite happy to be on my own. I have a very restricted diet due to having oversensitive smell and taste and am apt to tripping over my feet and getting distracted easily as well as being able to concentrate when left alone.  There is also the chronic depression and anxiety, the complete inability to change the way I do things, the knowledge that I am always right .....(!)  the difficulty I have with the way neurotypicals communicate and various other attributes I have.  But most people just think of me as 'strange'  I have 'come out' at work, I get an immense amounnt of support from colleagues, but to managers I am just that awkward blighter who wants to get his own way.

The law unfortunately does not seem to prevent others from wanting to change you from thinking that you can be changed.  From thinking that there ought to be a cure, from 'feeling sorry' for you, from looking for loopholes in the equality act (and the eqality act is full of holes that a manager will try to use as a way to get rid of someone, I am sure that was it not for my support worker at work that I would have been dismissed on the grounds of incapability or insubordination.

And for the equality act to be successful others must know of your condition.  This is easy at work.  However, when we have a 'misunderstanding' somewhere that others don't know of our condition, we have to explain it.  Our condition is not visible in the same way as someone who is confined to a wheelchair, is blind, or is without one or more limbs.  And if caught out somewhere having a misunderstanding to say we are autistic as the reason unfortunately seems like an excuse for bad behaviour to others.

So yes, the Equallty act is a help.  It does not however prevent ignorance.

o

I agree that the Equality Act should include Autism as a disability.  Myself, I am getting some 'reasonable adjustments' at work and this is welcome.

Unfortunately, it does not go far enough.  As Autism is 'invisible', many people refuse to acknowledge it is causing a problem.  Even a lot of autistic people refuse to concede they are 'disabled'.  To be covered in the workplace, one must prove that it has a 'significant effect' on day to day living.  Now this should be easy, unfortunately there is a lot of opinion as to what is or what is not a significant effect.

Then there is the problem of diagnosis.  Even when diagnosed a lot of people think that so and so's autism is only mild or is not severe enough.  Myself I had great difficulty at work, I was referred to occupational health on three occasions before they finally conceded I had problems.  And problems I do have as a neurotypical would consider although I would not think they are a problem for me.  They do affect my everyday life, I will not go out to a meal for instance and do not socialise with others, I am quite happy to be on my own. I have a very restricted diet due to having oversensitive smell and taste and am apt to tripping over my feet and getting distracted easily as well as being able to concentrate when left alone.  There is also the chronic depression and anxiety, the complete inability to change the way I do things, the knowledge that I am always right .....(!)  the difficulty I have with the way neurotypicals communicate and various other attributes I have.  But most people just think of me as 'strange'  I have 'come out' at work, I get an immense amounnt of support from colleagues, but to managers I am just that awkward blighter who wants to get his own way.

The law unfortunately does not seem to prevent others from wanting to change you from thinking that you can be changed.  From thinking that there ought to be a cure, from 'feeling sorry' for you, from looking for loopholes in the equality act (and the eqality act is full of holes that a manager will try to use as a way to get rid of someone, I am sure that was it not for my support worker at work that I would have been dismissed on the grounds of incapability or insubordination.

And for the equality act to be successful others must know of your condition.  This is easy at work.  However, when we have a 'misunderstanding' somewhere that others don't know of our condition, we have to explain it.  Our condition is not visible in the same way as someone who is confined to a wheelchair, is blind, or is without one or more limbs.  And if caught out somewhere having a misunderstanding to say we are autistic as the reason unfortunately seems like an excuse for bad behaviour to others.

So yes, the Equallty act is a help.  It does not however prevent ignorance.

o