• Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 84 subscribers
  • Views 101 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

The power of language

Wordsmith

I was struck again yesterday by the power of a change of language to change one’s perception of autism and autistic traits. The example I came across was an alternative expansion of PDA: instead of pathological demand avoidance, it is sometimes referred to as a pervasive drive for autonomy.

Previously, I had dismissed the possibility that I might exhibit PDA (avoidance? pathological??). But pervasive drive for autonomy? That fits like a glove. From my childhood rejection of any help that my teachers offered to my inability to work as part of a team (unless I have a clearly defined autonomous role to play) to my suspicion of anyone who tries to exert authority over me.

So, I was wondering whether you have similar experiences of seeing an autistic trait in a new (and more positive) light because it has been described in a new way?

Parents

  • That's unpathologising it (if that's a word).

    There have been lots of discussions here in the past about the 'pathologising' of autism and that it should just be seen as a difference, per Stuart333's reply.

    What I've struggled with is that if the medical terms were removed then these conditions wouldn't be seen as a disability and therefore any concessions and financial support etc would be removed.

    Also, there are those who are more 'profoundly' autistic etc and these people can have many support needs.

    I would like autism to be referred to as just autism, but if an appendage is required, condition rather than disorder would be best I think.

Reply

  • That's unpathologising it (if that's a word).

    There have been lots of discussions here in the past about the 'pathologising' of autism and that it should just be seen as a difference, per Stuart333's reply.

    What I've struggled with is that if the medical terms were removed then these conditions wouldn't be seen as a disability and therefore any concessions and financial support etc would be removed.

    Also, there are those who are more 'profoundly' autistic etc and these people can have many support needs.

    I would like autism to be referred to as just autism, but if an appendage is required, condition rather than disorder would be best I think.

Children
No Data