• Replies 45 replies
  • Subscribers 91 subscribers
  • Views 1747 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Why Did Number Leave This Place?

Number

Dear Fellow Online Community users,

NAS purport to encourage the adult autistic community to share and talk here ...... albeit within RULES which they set ..... which is obviously both essential and fair enough.

However, NAS also readily, happily, shamelessly and without ANY warning, simply terminate any such discussions at will, even when they READILY and OPENLY CONFIRM that no rules are being broken WHATSOEVER at that point THEY choose to terminate a discussion.

If adult autists can't discuss what's on their minds HERE.......then what - LITERALLY - is the point of having an 18+ adult-only autistic COMMUNITY forum space?

If we are given rules to abide by, and abide by them, but are also subject to unilateral and unjustified termination of our discussions.....then there is ZERO hope for this place?

With utter disgust, and disbelief (again - within the space of 24 hours.......when I'm not even "here" any more!)

Number.

PS - I CERTAINLY don't want to discuss pornography in this place.......but I WILL defend the rights of those who do wish to do so, within the rules set by Der current Management!!

PPS - If you mistake the above for hyperbole - please take a look at the (now locked thread) entitled "What do you think about pornography from Autistic perspective."

Next-level Shameful !?

  • I didn't think much of it when I saw the locked thread but I think you have a point to be fair. I was really surprised when I saw that particular topic come up I must say but it was clear just by reading that sentence what the thread was about so I never went into the thread as I would be very uncomfortable discussing it. I think it should be as simple as that. I do think it is important for that reason that people are open and probably quite specific when naming their threads so that people don't get a shock and end up reading something that triggers them.

    It does start a problem with where do you draw the line. A lot of people on here, myself included, discuss mental health. And at times that can become quite dark and could intact be very triggering. But it would be hugely problematic to lock threads like that.

    I can understand a thread being shut down if the discussion is getting out of hand and might lead to rule breaking out of frustration and people getting upset. 

    I think there just needs to be a rule that if you are going to post about something that could be triggering to people, you make sure that is written in the name. Then common sense needs to prevail and if you're not comfortable with that particular subject, just don't open it.

  • in reply to FrozenHeart

    It's a no.......but as always.....that is not a commitment to "attendance."

  • in reply to FrozenHeart

    As you know - I felt compelled to delete my "actual" account a good few months ago.......precisely due to THIS type of nonsense I have highlighted above......but also due to "hard-fought" honesty that I (and others) were able to (eventually) extract from NAS about the extent to which it is possible for their moderators to "look within" our PM's, with impunity.

    People with searchlights......often get "shot"......long before they withdraw?