Published on 12, July, 2020
All her life my daughter has fought the stigma that being Autistic was defined as, first a "learning disabilty" and now a "disability". It has destroyed her life, made her feel inferior and sapped her self confidence. Then to see the BBC describe autism as a "lifelong disability" made me furious. Then to find that the source of this bigotry is the definition on the NAS website makes me incandescent with rage. I too am Autistic. The NAS does not represent me or my daughter. The challenges which Autistic poeple face are not what we are but how we are misunderstood. For the NAS to insist on perpetuating these myths makes you part of the problem. I can only presume your definition of Autism was written and approved by a bunch of, perhaps well-meaning, poeple who suffer from Autism Deficiency Syndrome and who lack the flexibility of thought that Autism gives us and we, in turn, have given the world the technology which I am using to write this.
i have a similar issue with the BBC implying that all people with autism have special needs. Some people with autism may have special needs but there are also people with autism who do not have special needs.
I don’t like the term special needs, I think it is infantilising and inaccurate. We have human needs like every one else and every human has different needs.
Ausomely Autistic said:I don’t like the term special needs,
Many autists do have special needs though.
Some cannot speak on the phone due to various autism related issues
Some cannot tolerate being around groups or crowds
Some cannot tolerate loud noises, types of lighting or smells
Etc
The needs are legion and it is because of this that I believe we need this term whether it applies to me personally or not - we need to look at the bigger picture of our tribe in my opinion.
That’s great, everyone needs flexibility.