Dogma Surrounding Autism

As I’ve come across more people claiming autistic people are a problem it’s made me realise there’s a lot of dogmatic assumptions and beliefs about autism.

The main example is the assumption autism is a social problem because we don’t fit social norms and that social norms are inherently good. When we look to the past we can see “social norms” are actually inherently bad, social norms by their nature are discriminatory and are in direct violation of human rights such as autonomy. Less than a century ago treating women like they’re something less and have fewer rights than men was the social norm. In the 19th century slavery was part of the social norm. Each time we look at a social norm from any time period today’s people frown on it, it must of been someone with a “social problem” to want to deviate and change the social norm. I wonder if any of them were autistic!

Another example is the dogmatic assumption autistic people have a difficulty making friends. Autistic people do all that’s needed to be done to become friends, the reason things don’t work out is because the nonautistic people have a difficulty accepting people who don’t fit the standard norm. Nonautistic people are simply blaming their difficulties on autistic people, friendships are a two way street after all, not the autistic one is responsible for everything. 

I won’t list all the dogmatic assumptions that came to my mind but as one last example, the assumption autistic people have nothing good to offer society which is why they find the idea of a cure beneficial. I can believe that numerous of the greatest scientists throughout history were autistic because “autism traits” are the precise behaviours required to make new discoveries. Narrow interests, detail orientation, intensely focused, can detach themselves from people and spend more time on their work, better at recognising systems and patterns. I would say all these autism traits are of high value if the autistic person is given the opportunity to use them, and that they should be on the “Human Ability Spectrum” instead of defined as “deficits”.

I see a lot of dogma surrounding autism and hypocrisy by people failing to evaluate today’s social norms that people fail to recognise they have the very same difficulties.

Parents
  • Can I ask, have you read C. G. Jung, Civilization in Transition, or more specifically the essays The Undiscovered Self and After the Catastrophe? Without trying to say anything in the context of your words, I feel that the book offer perspectives from another time with other challenges, yet, many of them are still relevant. Not even psychoanalysts understand the inner world of the autistic psyche.

    Seeing that the descriptions of autism are more like superstitions rather than understanding, i was glad to find your words when I googled "autistic dogma", finding others also seeing something similar to me.

    But one thing I would like to point out, the autistic also needs to be careful to not create dogmas about the 'normal' ones.

    What does it say about humanity as a whole when a smaller group is forced to loudly validate or explain themselves from the negative assumptions of others?

Reply
  • Can I ask, have you read C. G. Jung, Civilization in Transition, or more specifically the essays The Undiscovered Self and After the Catastrophe? Without trying to say anything in the context of your words, I feel that the book offer perspectives from another time with other challenges, yet, many of them are still relevant. Not even psychoanalysts understand the inner world of the autistic psyche.

    Seeing that the descriptions of autism are more like superstitions rather than understanding, i was glad to find your words when I googled "autistic dogma", finding others also seeing something similar to me.

    But one thing I would like to point out, the autistic also needs to be careful to not create dogmas about the 'normal' ones.

    What does it say about humanity as a whole when a smaller group is forced to loudly validate or explain themselves from the negative assumptions of others?

Children
  • Some commentator have suggested, on the strength of how Jung described his inner life as a child, that he suffered from childhood schizophrenia.

    That term, by the way, is a massive misnomer. It would be seen as autism now, I did do some research on when the term was used for children, and when psychologists ceased using it, which was in the late 80's. Nancy Spungen was diagnosed with it too, though no doubt it does come with certain specific comorbidities too.

    Jung had a lot of really interesting things to say regarding the psyche, spirituality, and the societies created by a species with a limited consciousness, but as he grew up to be pretty charismatic, he did get onto  something of a guru trip. He was a man of his times, his views on women could be pretty reactionary.

    I think Jung was one of the first to male a distinction between intrpversion and extroversion. He always saw the need to create and conform to social norms as being more of an extroversion thing.