All my posts are being monitored ?

one fact u got wrong ---- u said i reported you and I didnt  where is your evidence ? 

this forum is for support and kindness if you cant agree to that then please leave

Caelus How likely do you think it is that Hitler would have gained power if he'd said he wanted to exterminate people in concentration camps? Do you think it would have won him a large share of the vote?

Hitler and other dictators gain power by telling the people what they want to hear about equality and fairness and something and stuff, because they want to gain support.

What they do while in power decides what kind of leader they were. Not what they promised or said they were about while campaigning. By their rule they are judged as dictators, regardless of whatever they called themselves to pretend they were something else. 

If you have a restaurant and I buy it on condition I will continue the restaurant business, but instead I immediately close and sell, would I be able to call myself a restauranteur based on the promises I made you? Would you still consider me a restauranteur if you knew I'd never run the restaurant as promised?

Or would you just think I was a con man?

As for Hitler, the way he got into power wasn't straight-forward and their was a lot of maneuvering to get him there, and even then the *** never achieved more than 44% of the vote, if I'm not mistaken. He certainly wasn't swept into office on a wave of socialism, if anything he played more on nationalist issues and concerns like the anger of the German people over the Treaty of Versailles and the effects of German surrender in WW1 on the morale and pride of the German people. 

If you read about Nazi propaganda and how they managed to hoodwink the people they did you might see some similarities to recent parties and campaigns. 

Those who don't learn history are doomed to repeat it. 

Who is in charge of the UK right now? Was it the left who won, was it? Was it Labour? Was it the Greens? Or was it the Tories, led by a man with a documented history of racism?

Who until recently was in charge in the US? Was it the left wing guy, or the right wing guy?

Let's look at Russia and China-are their leaders lefties?

The actual oppressors are put in place-and propped up-by the right. And when democracy becomes a problem for them they undermine it, they try to change the rules of the game. You don't get to support people and parties like that then claim you're a victim of fascism. You're not it's victim, you're it's host, you welcomed it in with your bitterness and intolerance and inability to see how these emotiond were manipulated by powerful people to make you do what they want and vote against your own interests. 

You don't know a thing about me. First of all, I'm not a female, which you seem to imply. The clue is in the name. 

Second of all, you say you've offended multiple females on here. Multiple females, one you. In each instance, the female is different, the male is the same person, but in each case the woman is offended. Is it more likely that all these women have a problem or is it more likely that you, the constant, are the one causing the problem? Would it not make everyone's life easier to just be nice? To not say things you know people find offensive?

You can use the 'I'm real and the world can't handle me' type of excuse and try and dress it up as something else but in essence it's just a case of you saying things you know people find offensive because it's more important to you to have the freedom to be an arsehole to people than it is to have the freedom to make the world a bit more pleasant and a bit less ***. When you strip away all this crap about 'free speech' and 'liberty' that's all the right want. The freedom to be arseholes. And because the left stand against them they're '***' or 'fascists', despite holding values which are the complete opposite to ***, and that it is usually the people they oppose who make the Nazi salutes and have the right wing tattoos. Funny that. 

Hmm...

Maybe we should outlaw the use of certain words like 'gammon' to avoid causing offence? Sort of like what the left suggest we do in not using derogatory terms to describe people of different ethnicities and sexual persuasions. But don't the right think we should all be able to freely use whatever words we like and ignore the snowflakes who have a problem with it?

In this case I'm going to take the approach of the right wing and say my opinion of the word and those it describes are more important than the feelings of those such words offend, and they'll just have to get over it.

I could be more civilised and sensitive and underdtanding and reasonable but I choose not to be. 

aye maybe so, but perhaps the explosion is larger than they imagined and it ends up hurting their feelings much more than they thought and last a long time lol

sometimes the way around them wanting that is to go harsher than they could have imagined, to teach a lesson to not kick things thinking they are smart asses, because the thing they kick could well be a nuclear bomb much more potent than they could handle and leave them with egg on their face wishing theyd never kicked it in the first place and thus knowing to not do that to anything again.

That doesn't seem like a  good idea. Tit for tat just escalates into full out war.

If someone is purposefully winding you up then you owe it to yourself to not get wound up, and politely offer your viewpoint, don't let them manipulate you. That would drive them crazy, you exploding will have them in fits of giggles. Sometimes people love to cause other people to go off like a volcano and then point them out to mods, it does happen. 

Caelus said:

you cannot get people arrested for saying mean words under the hate crime act... it is a motivator to be tagged into a actual crime, meaning the person actually needs to commit a actual crime like assault or harrassment for it toi be a arrestable offence. words are never illegal

You are, as I've tried to explain once before, incorrect. Hate speech *IS* classed as a hate crime and *IS* punishable by law in and of itself! A man tweeted "The only good British soldier is a dead one", in response to Captain Tom's death. He's been arrested and charged with a hate crime and is awaiting trial. He didn't physically assault Captain Tom, he merely voiced his hateful opinion.

HATE SPEECH laws in England and Wales are found in several statutes. EXPRESSIONS of HATRED toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, disability, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, gender reassignment, or sexual orientation is forbidden. ANY COMMUNICATION which is threatening or ABUSIVE, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden. The penalties for hate speech include FINES, IMPRISONMENT OR BOTH.

The CPS explains it here:

https://www.cps.gov.uk/crime-info/hate-crime

Exactly, if OP didn't enjoy the fact that they were being provocative, they wouldn't be going on like this.

the rules are blurred because we have loud idiots in the world taking hate crime to mean your not allowed to say anything... which isnt how it works (thus the confusion is due to loud people speaking without knowing, and threatening and trying to bend and use the law to bully and arrest people they disagree with kinda like the fascists did).... hate crime doesnt stop any speach at all, hate crime is a motivator label added to a real crime like harrassment or assault. you cannot get people arrested for saying mean words under the hate crime act... it is a motivator to be tagged into a actual crime, meaning the person actually needs to commit a actual crime like assault or harrassment for it toi be a arrestable offence. words are never illegal.... until ofcourse islam becomes majority and brings in solid blashphemy laws, then we shall get words being illegal.... and any freedom at all will also be illegal 

ofcourse then there is public disorder offence which people also lump in with it to confuse it and say you can be arrested for just words... but public disorder offence was created so the police can arrest you for anything, its a slap on the wrist offence that is only there to give police powers to move people... say... from protests.... to another place out of the way... to control said protest... its a slap on the wrist thing, a bending of the law in order to crowd control but it can be used on anyone, which kinda is its purpose.

Their is a massive problem with this rule, It is that people take offence at what someone has said without trying to understand why they have gotten to that opinion. Its amplified on this community page because of how some of the individuals lack of ability to empathise unless they have been in that position themselves.   

example of this happening on the community page are conversation or post involving gender equality, their views of gender reassignment surgery & political matters. 

half the time those who get offended push someone off this community page because they mis interpreted what they have written instead of allowing them to explain.

Many things can be considered hate speech. Me saying " I hate SpongeBob" is hate crime against a depiction of a non conforming character who many identify with and can take offence  as an attack on those who identify with sponge bob. the rules have become blurred and to complex to keep up with.    

well i think the trick of the rich is to pretty much buy up all the passive income sources, such as landlording/housing.... and then that makes them limitless free money without ever needing to life a finger to work, hence the road to riches is toi not work at all but instead to own and charge rent on others.... then that housing gets passed on through their family, granting their entire family line a passive income that keeps getting passed on in their family to the end of time so that none of their family now or in the future ever need to work or think of a income source. ofcourse this then makes life for everyone else much more expensive having to pay them rent and rising the house prices up due to them monopolising and taking all property like that.

You are responsible for your own actions and emotions. You are deliberately using words to provoke. Your aware that your inflicting harm and by your comments you enjoy it.     

Its because your forgetting something really important. A dream is wish you make on your own. We humans have forgotten something really important in last seventy years. it take connecting with others to make your dreams grow into a reality. 

How do you think the wealthy are staying wealthy. they are dividing and conquering the economic system, bribing people in power while we are to distracted from seeing them doing it when its happening in the act. 

Work is effort, if you settle for working for someone else instead of your self and loved ones your setting yourself up for failure. 

to be fair its a bit hard to turn dreams or desires into reality. one of the traps of society is the want of being rich or well off or even retiring.... and being tricked into thinking hard work is the way to do that, when its not, work doesnt really pay, it makes you scrape by thats all, it isnt the road to riches people desire, it hardly provide you the ability to retire at the end of a long lifes work these days.

my dad fell for the whole hard work all your life makes you rich, i always pointed out the flaw in it, that his poor dad who told him that worked all his life and was never rich and he himself worked all his life and is only scraping by. so clearly hard work all your life gets you nowhere and is a trick told to poor people to keep them in slave labour all their lives. people only realise that at the end of their lives when they realised they wasted all their lives working and cant even retire, i think my dad only just realises it.

Its because your not trying to understand others alternative views and automatically dismiss them. It's not like your not capable of listening to their opinion. Being open minded is allowing oneself to change.

Your language shows a patterns of hostility because you use words like "the sensitive lefties". You have to remember that divide and conquer is the best way to establish control. While everyone is fighting over the small things people become oblivious to real problems that is occurring with the people in or taking control. At the end of the day both the political left and the right are dumbasses that are too distracted from need to be done. 

Everyone is scared their choosing sides but no one is turning their dreams into reality. Flinging words like excrement is waste of time and energy.    

sensitivity should never be confused with weakness, its a strength and a unique skill these days.     

You need understand that the world is not always black and white and that all actions can be interpreted and intended in different ways. In kindness their is always darkness and in darkness their is always kindness.

Being brutally honest can be an act of kindness, but it also carries darkest truths that people do not wish to acknowledge about themselves. Sometimes people need to hear the truth to make a positive change but there is a time and place that we have to respect. not everyone is ready to acknowledge their short comings and some individuals need to work through it and come to the conclusions themselves.

Yes, being direct is easier for some, you know where you stand with other but not everyone is the same way.     

Good! Your mind is equally closed.

I've understood, and agree with, all you've written. It's very plainly put. I've had the same thoughts as you, re: NT behaviour, reactions etc. 

Plastic said:

Martin said:

white men, do not constitute a race,

Seems to indicate a certain sector of the population.

..but what he really said is

Martin said:

Red-faced, apoplectic, opinionated middle-aged white men, do not constitute a race, in anyone's reasoning.

LOL! I've seen misquotes before but to take PART of a sentence to fit your own needs.