Terrorism! So now Brexit Gov Says Autistics are Terrorists

i dont get why people keep calling the tories far right.... you know they think autistics are terrorists because they think we are right wing, and they assume right wing means dangerous terrorist due to lefty lies and conditioning that has people thinking a entire political side is terrorist. and thus the reason they say autists are terrorists is because we are blunt and honest and that makes us look right wing and thus right wing they have demonised to be terrorist and so thats why autists who they consider as nasty right wingers they will put on terror watchlists.... so how is that right wing when that is a anti-right wing action? lol

the tory party was also built on one party socialism of which the current tory regime calls itself and points out all the time. which is why they have always been pro-mass migration and kept bringing in migrants even through the lockdown because they are actually far left wing socialist and going back to their founding roots of one party socialism which was created by benjamin whats his face that jewish bloke. all in all theres alot of false info out there and mind games to the point its so messed and muddled up that even i cant honestly keep track of it or judge who or which party represents what any more as its all over the place.

Caelus said:

i dont get why people keep calling the tories far right.... you know they think autistics are terrorists because they think we are right wing, and they assume right wing means dangerous terrorist due to lefty lies and conditioning that has people thinking a entire political side is terrorist.

As I explained before ~ the fundament principle of socialism is that all people are considered as being equals, and the fundamental principle of capitalism is that all people are considered as having potential and or actual merit.

A blend of both principles of philosophy can be described as either being to some extent quasi-socialism or quasi-capitalism, and a rejection of the fundamental principles in terms of only some individuals being considered equal or having potential and or actual merit ~ can be described as foe-socialism, or foe-capitalism, as being to increasing extents more uncivilised involving therefore more extremism, or ultimately more terrorism.

Also, in terms of describing yourself as not getting why people keep calling the conservatives far right ~ it seems very much that you do not recall having done the same thing regarding socialists as I previously addressed with you on the GB here News (New British News Network) thread, and that you were not aware of making the sweeping derogatory generalisation yourself about left-wing oriented people on this thread also ~ as above.

Such contextual blindness and cognitive dissonance results from verbal or also physical violence during at least childhood to be other than is actually the case ~ such as not autistic, with the programming and conditioning of such violently enforced behaviour diminishing and impeding the receptive mind states, and exaggerating and impairing the protective and the projective states of mind ~ hence the conflicted ideologies and contradictory behaviourisms thing.    

im left wing orientated myself though but i am true to the ideology unlike the loud ones that have fronted and taken over the label of left wing socialist. i just confuse it all by using the labels what people claim... the people who i call left wing.. i dont consider them left wing... .they call themselves left wing and socialists, but they are not that... the people that call themselves left wing socialists, i see them as far ultra right wing fascists that are lying to get their way like adolf hitler did in the 30s when he too called himself a socialists while fronting violent mobs to attack his poltical opponents and bringing in identity politics based on race much like the so called left wing socialists are doing with both race and gender again now.... it confuses things because i use the labels what they use.... if i were to brand them with the labels what i think they are, id be calling all this lgbt, corbyn, remainer crowd ultra right wing gestapo fascists instead.

if these people are socialists who call themselves socialist, then why did they reject brexit, the biggest political change, and decided to reject change and stick with tradition, and not only that their main argument was "but the economy!" lol they arnt left wing nor socialist..... they acted based on the economy above the peoples will, which is capitalist of them to do, and they rejected change and voted the way the rich elite and big bankers and tory party itself demanded they vote, again very capitalist. they insulted the working classes and looked down on brexit voters as poor thick and ignorant and of lesser lifestyle and importance. again, very right wing and capitalistic. then they also front violent mobs that claim to be anti-fascist but yet wear black political uniforms and call themselves the black block, much like after the black shirts and even wear red armbands too. be in no mistake those that call themselves left wing socialists are not that what so ever and are instead tricking people. they are pure fascists to the very core.

Caelus said:

Deepthought said:

slandering them for slandering your own or anyone else’s sensibilities ~ is not treating anyone equally

it sorta is though... side a calls side b fascist so side b then calls side a fascist and thus everyone is equal in what they call each other and thus theres no problems, if side a has a problem with being called fascists then they shouldnt have first called side b fascist shouldnt they?

Two wrongs are not known to make things right though, given that adversity is not equality ~ but rather excessive competition involving increasing aggression; and regressive cooperation involving decreasing compassion ~ plus those ‘eye for an eye and tooth for tooth’ states of affairs are quite infamous for making people more blind to toxic interactions and less able to chew on and digest healthier scenarios; when it would be more pertinent to convert from using the instinctively mimicking ‘I’ to the intuitively adaptive ‘I’ ~ and thereby advance from using rotting wisdom to going onto fruitful wisdom, and all that.

Equality though involves ‘men and women, people of different races, religions, etcetera, all being treated fairly and having the same opportunities’ in the sense of individually living productive and fulfilling lives, without any of that being superior or inferior to one another or better or worse than anyone else.

Deepthought said:

I would suggest firstly that the staggeringly high intensity of the training programs for extremists and terrorists in the education system should at least be lowered then.

Caelus said:

^^ yes.... there should be no teaching of political ideology in schools at all... there should only be fact.... teachers that spread opinion or ideology need to be fired from their jobs. school should be a place of learning and fact. not of indoctrination and opinion spreading. opinions have no place in schools, only facts, the student can make their own opinion up based on the facts they are taught and we shall have a much better society.

Political ideology is not though taught in primary or secondary school education curriculums, although in the secondary education curriculum there is the Citizenship Education Programme, as “should foster pupils’ keen awareness and understanding of democracy, government and how laws are made and upheld.” which is essential and requisite teaching after all.

Colleges and far more often universities include political involvements though, what with people of voting age attending, and the higher education population providing many new potential voters, members and campaigners and all that ~ hence the government and other political parties and campaign movements etcetera being or periodically getting as such involved most particularly at election times.

The actual difficulty is though that children are being pressurised into achieving high qualification results at both primary and secondary schools now, and with teachers being economically forced into pressurising pupils to do well; along with parents getting more desperate or despondent about their children eventually doing well economically also ~ children are more then as a result competitively bullying one another and those more particularly who do not do so well socially.

Deepthought said:

slandering them for slandering your own or anyone else’s sensibilities ~ is not treating anyone equally

it sorta is though... side a calls side b fascist so side b then calls side a fascist and thus everyone is equal in what they call each other and thus theres no problems, if side a has a problem with being called fascists then they shouldnt have first called side b fascist shouldnt they?

"I would suggest firstly that the staggeringly high intensity of the training programs for extremists and terrorists in the education system should at least be lowered then."

^^ yes.... there should be no teaching of political ideology in schools at all... there should only be fact.... teachers that spread opinion or ideology need to be fired from their jobs. school should be a place of learning and fact. not of indoctrination and opinion spreading. opinions have no place in schools, only facts, the student can make their own opinion up based on the facts they are taught and we shall have a much better society.

Deepthought said:

slandering them for slandering your own or anyone else’s sensibilities ~ is not treating anyone equally

it sorta is though... side a calls side b fascist so side b then calls side a fascist and thus everyone is equal in what they call each other and thus theres no problems, if side a has a problem with being called fascists then they shouldnt have first called side b fascist shouldnt they?

"I would suggest firstly that the staggeringly high intensity of the training programs for extremists and terrorists in the education system should at least be lowered then."

^^ yes.... there should be no teaching of political ideology in schools at all... there should only be fact.... teachers that spread opinion or ideology need to be fired from their jobs. school should be a place of learning and fact. not of indoctrination and opinion spreading. opinions have no place in schools, only facts, the student can make their own opinion up based on the facts they are taught and we shall have a much better society.

Caelus said:

Deepthought said:

slandering them for slandering your own or anyone else’s sensibilities ~ is not treating anyone equally

it sorta is though... side a calls side b fascist so side b then calls side a fascist and thus everyone is equal in what they call each other and thus theres no problems, if side a has a problem with being called fascists then they shouldnt have first called side b fascist shouldnt they?

Two wrongs are not known to make things right though, given that adversity is not equality ~ but rather excessive competition involving increasing aggression; and regressive cooperation involving decreasing compassion ~ plus those ‘eye for an eye and tooth for tooth’ states of affairs are quite infamous for making people more blind to toxic interactions and less able to chew on and digest healthier scenarios; when it would be more pertinent to convert from using the instinctively mimicking ‘I’ to the intuitively adaptive ‘I’ ~ and thereby advance from using rotting wisdom to going onto fruitful wisdom, and all that.

Equality though involves ‘men and women, people of different races, religions, etcetera, all being treated fairly and having the same opportunities’ in the sense of individually living productive and fulfilling lives, without any of that being superior or inferior to one another or better or worse than anyone else.

Deepthought said:

I would suggest firstly that the staggeringly high intensity of the training programs for extremists and terrorists in the education system should at least be lowered then.

Caelus said:

^^ yes.... there should be no teaching of political ideology in schools at all... there should only be fact.... teachers that spread opinion or ideology need to be fired from their jobs. school should be a place of learning and fact. not of indoctrination and opinion spreading. opinions have no place in schools, only facts, the student can make their own opinion up based on the facts they are taught and we shall have a much better society.

Political ideology is not though taught in primary or secondary school education curriculums, although in the secondary education curriculum there is the Citizenship Education Programme, as “should foster pupils’ keen awareness and understanding of democracy, government and how laws are made and upheld.” which is essential and requisite teaching after all.

Colleges and far more often universities include political involvements though, what with people of voting age attending, and the higher education population providing many new potential voters, members and campaigners and all that ~ hence the government and other political parties and campaign movements etcetera being or periodically getting as such involved most particularly at election times.

The actual difficulty is though that children are being pressurised into achieving high qualification results at both primary and secondary schools now, and with teachers being economically forced into pressurising pupils to do well; along with parents getting more desperate or despondent about their children eventually doing well economically also ~ children are more then as a result competitively bullying one another and those more particularly who do not do so well socially.