DLA to PIP scoring logic

I have just being looking at the PIP assessment wording for the mobility component and I am puzzled by the logic in the scoring.  To me, A, below, means the person cannot undertake any journey at all. B means they can undertake familiar journies if they have support of some kind. So why does B score more points than A?

Crucially A is below threshold and B is above Undecided

 

A.      Cannot undertake any journey because it would cause overwhelming psychological distress to the claimant.

 

B.      Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid.

Parents
  • Kalojaro: get out IF you can ! ,

    I listened to a woman talking to an old friend she just again met in library. Catching up,, I summarise

    I leave to go to live in Australia in two months, my husband is an engineer, he has job offer and I have just finished my nursing qualification so I can get a job too. My son is now 15, I am really worried about him, this future, so it will be good for him. As you know my parents moved over there 5 years ago, so we are set up to live with them until we buy our own place later. My brother is staying in the UK, until we are set up and he will come over in 1 or 2 years..............

    What I listened too there,, WAS THE FAILURE OF A COUNTRY.. a whole three generations of a family moving out on a wagon. Grandparents, Parents, Children and relatives. It was like something from the third world, not a so called advanced country.

    Her friend replied that is wonderful, I wish it was me too.

    LONDON does not get this... because it is a foriegn country in England. The Scots are putting up a Hadrian WALL as they know this,, do the English ? Who are the English now ? British ? European ? Commonwealth ? psuedo America's ? planterism ? .. time will tell !

    Thank god,  I am not an English man, because they do not have a whole country anymore. They can dance around the Queen and pretend they have, but they do not have a whole country, they have a split country..........

    Maybe, the ENGLAND should just be renamed the ALL NATIONS. Interesting, only if all the other countries follow suit. With 6-7 Million immigrants living on an island of 55 million... do the maths,, the invasion of all nations.

     

     

Reply
  • Kalojaro: get out IF you can ! ,

    I listened to a woman talking to an old friend she just again met in library. Catching up,, I summarise

    I leave to go to live in Australia in two months, my husband is an engineer, he has job offer and I have just finished my nursing qualification so I can get a job too. My son is now 15, I am really worried about him, this future, so it will be good for him. As you know my parents moved over there 5 years ago, so we are set up to live with them until we buy our own place later. My brother is staying in the UK, until we are set up and he will come over in 1 or 2 years..............

    What I listened too there,, WAS THE FAILURE OF A COUNTRY.. a whole three generations of a family moving out on a wagon. Grandparents, Parents, Children and relatives. It was like something from the third world, not a so called advanced country.

    Her friend replied that is wonderful, I wish it was me too.

    LONDON does not get this... because it is a foriegn country in England. The Scots are putting up a Hadrian WALL as they know this,, do the English ? Who are the English now ? British ? European ? Commonwealth ? psuedo America's ? planterism ? .. time will tell !

    Thank god,  I am not an English man, because they do not have a whole country anymore. They can dance around the Queen and pretend they have, but they do not have a whole country, they have a split country..........

    Maybe, the ENGLAND should just be renamed the ALL NATIONS. Interesting, only if all the other countries follow suit. With 6-7 Million immigrants living on an island of 55 million... do the maths,, the invasion of all nations.

     

     

Children
No Data