Convicted for following Samaritans and mental health standard advice. Can anyone write a letter to support my appeal

---

DaveAsperg said:

I’ve written on here lots of times about the fact that the police and cps prosecuted me for trying to help suicidal ideation. As an autistic doctor this seems to be a very inappropriate and dangerous course of action and I am desperate to find positive actions that may help me survive. I feel a misunderstood failure who is alone against the law.

samaritans and all the suicide charities I have approached all refuse to help. Asking for help when suicidal does not seem malicious communication, but appropriate. However I seem alone in this viewpoint and need support from any major media or organisation. 

I seem to have run out of anyone now. Any idea? 

---

Being that the Samaritans and all suicide charities deal with the issue of helping people not to act on feelings and thoughts about committing suicide, they are unable to help you deal with either the financial or relative legal issues that you have written about ~ as these involve rather different sectors of service provision.

·

Or in other words ~ the Samaritans and all suicide charities are not then refusing to help you, as you seem to believe dealing with your suicidal problems involves clearing your name legally and re-establishing your financial credibility, which is not in their remit to provide or do.

·

You have been imagining otherwise using what is referred to as paradoxical or counterproductive thinking.

·

In a sense this is not too unlike someone trying to bring a dead friend, lover or pet back to life to stop themselves feeling depressed, with the added difficulty you have been isolating yourself even more from your family by having become excessively focused on your legal and financial interests, much as you did with your interests in your routines, academia and job previously involving suicide prevention.

·

This involves having a narrow range of sensibilities.

·

As a basic suggestion leave media outlets and organisations out of your legal pursuit as their job is to inform people on what date the proceedings begin, and on what basis they end. Also it would be rather counterproductive to increase or raise public awareness of your previous activities involving the dark web, as many people assume quite correctly that it has associations with the black market, and illegal conduct.

·

If you really must though continue on with your legal pursuits ~ focus more on gathering information about the psychological ramifications of having Asperger’s Syndrome, such as for instance the social interaction, imagination and communication incongruences, as include paradoxical thinking and narrow ranges of sensibility.

·

Learn to recognise firstly that the judgement against you seemed correct on basis of the Malicious Communications Act 1989; paragraph 1 (a) (ii) as stating (underlined) as follows:

---

1 Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

·

(1) Any person who sends to another person—

·

(a) a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—

·

(I) a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;

·

(ii) a threat; or

·

(iii) information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or

·

(b) any [F2article or electronic communication] which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature,

·

is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated.

·

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27/section/1

---

Being that you had ‘evidently’ (it seems) sent hundreds of emails to an individual with two of these reading as follows:

·

"I am contacting you out of desperation, I believe you are the only person who can help save my life."

·

And,

·

"I remain desperate to speak to you and since you know my life is at risk, I can't believe you are obstructing me in this."

·

With the individual in question as being (or having been) a financial advisor that had given you correct advice according to the financial regulator at least, and that you were attempting to get the financial advisor to resolve your pension investment losses on the basis that your life was at risk if they did not help you!?!

·

In one of the links you gave originally, you stated that, “The CPS used the Malicious communication act 1988 to convict me for Implied Threat of suicide. This does not seem at all in the spirit of what this act was intended for as there was no threat to the person I spoke to.” only you were threatening that person in an attempt to cause them enough distress or anxiety to get them to resolve your investment losses, which you held them personally responsible for.

·

You were basically convicted for emotionally blackmailing the individual by way of holding your life to ransom ~ not too unlike stating, “Do what I say or I will kill myself!!!” and all that.

·

The case made against you though may have lacked pertinent information about Asperger’s Syndrome (in your particular case and circumstances) which could of prevented the judgement from actually having been a fully balanced decision; according to paragraph (2) (b) as stating (underlined) as follows:

---

(2) A person is not guilty of an offence by virtue of subsection (1) (a) (ii) above if he shows—

·

(a) that the threat was used to reinforce a demand [F3, made by him on reasonable grounds]; and

·

(b) that he believed [F4, and had reasonable grounds for believing,] that the use of the threat was a proper means of reinforcing the demand.

·

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27/section/1

---

In that your narrow range of sensibilities could not at the time (nor as yet it seems) imagine the social / ethical consequences of your interactions or communications, as you became (and remain) obsessively focused (or fixated) on the personal / moral ramifications of your pension investment losses, along with since also your criminal conviction relating to your suicidal threats involving these losses  ~ with all other considerations having become somewhat secondary or of no real significance to you.

·

I mean think about it . . . your family’s happiness, and even after having been convicted under paragraph 1 (a) (ii) of the Malicious Communications Act 1989; you are still writing posts implying that you are likely to kill yourself unless people support your legal campaign to help clear your name ~ on a forum for vulnerable adults on the autistic spectrum!?!

·

Such threatening (or emotionally blackmailing) communications will either look really bad in court if they get used as a defense against you ~ like the original lot were! Or perhaps instead you could follow previous and current advice about getting psychological assistance from an appropriately qualified mental health therapist. They might not only be able to help you with your mental health problems such as involving the 'Wounded' Child and 'Critical' Parent Ego-states previously explained (here), but they may also write a legal medico report that you were in fact following courses of action that you really believed truly to be quite reasonable ~ on account of your particular variant of the social interaction, imagination and communication incongruences ~ as are associated with having Asperger’s Syndrome, along with of course Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Suicidal Depression.

·

Just as an idea.

---

---

DaveAsperg said:

I’ve written on here lots of times about the fact that the police and cps prosecuted me for trying to help suicidal ideation. As an autistic doctor this seems to be a very inappropriate and dangerous course of action and I am desperate to find positive actions that may help me survive. I feel a misunderstood failure who is alone against the law.

samaritans and all the suicide charities I have approached all refuse to help. Asking for help when suicidal does not seem malicious communication, but appropriate. However I seem alone in this viewpoint and need support from any major media or organisation. 

I seem to have run out of anyone now. Any idea? 

---

Being that the Samaritans and all suicide charities deal with the issue of helping people not to act on feelings and thoughts about committing suicide, they are unable to help you deal with either the financial or relative legal issues that you have written about ~ as these involve rather different sectors of service provision.

·

Or in other words ~ the Samaritans and all suicide charities are not then refusing to help you, as you seem to believe dealing with your suicidal problems involves clearing your name legally and re-establishing your financial credibility, which is not in their remit to provide or do.

·

You have been imagining otherwise using what is referred to as paradoxical or counterproductive thinking.

·

In a sense this is not too unlike someone trying to bring a dead friend, lover or pet back to life to stop themselves feeling depressed, with the added difficulty you have been isolating yourself even more from your family by having become excessively focused on your legal and financial interests, much as you did with your interests in your routines, academia and job previously involving suicide prevention.

·

This involves having a narrow range of sensibilities.

·

As a basic suggestion leave media outlets and organisations out of your legal pursuit as their job is to inform people on what date the proceedings begin, and on what basis they end. Also it would be rather counterproductive to increase or raise public awareness of your previous activities involving the dark web, as many people assume quite correctly that it has associations with the black market, and illegal conduct.

·

If you really must though continue on with your legal pursuits ~ focus more on gathering information about the psychological ramifications of having Asperger’s Syndrome, such as for instance the social interaction, imagination and communication incongruences, as include paradoxical thinking and narrow ranges of sensibility.

·

Learn to recognise firstly that the judgement against you seemed correct on basis of the Malicious Communications Act 1989; paragraph 1 (a) (ii) as stating (underlined) as follows:

---

1 Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

·

(1) Any person who sends to another person—

·

(a) a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—

·

(I) a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;

·

(ii) a threat; or

·

(iii) information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or

·

(b) any [F2article or electronic communication] which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature,

·

is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated.

·

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27/section/1

---

Being that you had ‘evidently’ (it seems) sent hundreds of emails to an individual with two of these reading as follows:

·

"I am contacting you out of desperation, I believe you are the only person who can help save my life."

·

And,

·

"I remain desperate to speak to you and since you know my life is at risk, I can't believe you are obstructing me in this."

·

With the individual in question as being (or having been) a financial advisor that had given you correct advice according to the financial regulator at least, and that you were attempting to get the financial advisor to resolve your pension investment losses on the basis that your life was at risk if they did not help you!?!

·

In one of the links you gave originally, you stated that, “The CPS used the Malicious communication act 1988 to convict me for Implied Threat of suicide. This does not seem at all in the spirit of what this act was intended for as there was no threat to the person I spoke to.” only you were threatening that person in an attempt to cause them enough distress or anxiety to get them to resolve your investment losses, which you held them personally responsible for.

·

You were basically convicted for emotionally blackmailing the individual by way of holding your life to ransom ~ not too unlike stating, “Do what I say or I will kill myself!!!” and all that.

·

The case made against you though may have lacked pertinent information about Asperger’s Syndrome (in your particular case and circumstances) which could of prevented the judgement from actually having been a fully balanced decision; according to paragraph (2) (b) as stating (underlined) as follows:

---

(2) A person is not guilty of an offence by virtue of subsection (1) (a) (ii) above if he shows—

·

(a) that the threat was used to reinforce a demand [F3, made by him on reasonable grounds]; and

·

(b) that he believed [F4, and had reasonable grounds for believing,] that the use of the threat was a proper means of reinforcing the demand.

·

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27/section/1

---

In that your narrow range of sensibilities could not at the time (nor as yet it seems) imagine the social / ethical consequences of your interactions or communications, as you became (and remain) obsessively focused (or fixated) on the personal / moral ramifications of your pension investment losses, along with since also your criminal conviction relating to your suicidal threats involving these losses  ~ with all other considerations having become somewhat secondary or of no real significance to you.

·

I mean think about it . . . your family’s happiness, and even after having been convicted under paragraph 1 (a) (ii) of the Malicious Communications Act 1989; you are still writing posts implying that you are likely to kill yourself unless people support your legal campaign to help clear your name ~ on a forum for vulnerable adults on the autistic spectrum!?!

·

Such threatening (or emotionally blackmailing) communications will either look really bad in court if they get used as a defense against you ~ like the original lot were! Or perhaps instead you could follow previous and current advice about getting psychological assistance from an appropriately qualified mental health therapist. They might not only be able to help you with your mental health problems such as involving the 'Wounded' Child and 'Critical' Parent Ego-states previously explained (here), but they may also write a legal medico report that you were in fact following courses of action that you really believed truly to be quite reasonable ~ on account of your particular variant of the social interaction, imagination and communication incongruences ~ as are associated with having Asperger’s Syndrome, along with of course Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Suicidal Depression.

·

Just as an idea.

---

But the major financial loss was unregulated and th e media comments about the regulator ps comment were fictitious lies. There was no such comment and it came from the ifa himself.

i never said I was threatening anything and so the legal argument to allow exclusion did not come up.

i just diagnose what’s has happened and see the effect on me

the case was really all about a police campaign targeting a website and the other charges were added on after. The fact that the website is a fake scam was hidden by the media and the court prosecution. I didn’t place any order and never realised what I typed was being captured and sold to police

i am stuck with injustice, unfairness and media lies.