• Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 81 subscribers
  • Views 2087 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

help stop the prosecution of autistic people seeking help when suicidal

DaveAsperg

I have told my story on here lots and have now started a campaign to try and highlight one of the problems with the English legal system.

I hope this will get some publicity and help

[link removed by Moderator]

please look and see what you think. It's not really about the money (although that shows actions), but more to raise publicity and debate about prosecution of autistic people who have no intention of harm or criminal actions, but who are being judged by neurotypical standards, which will cause harm to autistic people

Parents

  • This is a crowd funding site and I'm not sure what they are for if not to raise money - I'm not being critical here I'm just trying to understand what your end goal is and how you plan to get there and what the £1,000 is to pay for. I have never used a crowd funding website so I may be showing my ignorance here. 

    I in no way mean to sound critical because I'm not and I am very sorry if that is how I sound, but I am rather confused by your page and the title of this thread. The confusing thing for me about the page that you link to is the last paragraph of the "Background to my Case" section and the paragraph in the green box titled "Summary of my Case". 

    The title of this thread makes it sound like more than one person is being prosecuted simply for asking for help when they feel suicidal but you page says that -"There has never been another case of conviction for someone requesting help when truly suicidal and following medical advice from other parties". 

    If people are being wrongfully prosecuted then obviously it must be stopped but I would also hate for people who are suicidal to be put off asking for help for fear that they might be prosecuted. 

    Any clarity you can offer would be much appreciated. :) 

Reply

  • This is a crowd funding site and I'm not sure what they are for if not to raise money - I'm not being critical here I'm just trying to understand what your end goal is and how you plan to get there and what the £1,000 is to pay for. I have never used a crowd funding website so I may be showing my ignorance here. 

    I in no way mean to sound critical because I'm not and I am very sorry if that is how I sound, but I am rather confused by your page and the title of this thread. The confusing thing for me about the page that you link to is the last paragraph of the "Background to my Case" section and the paragraph in the green box titled "Summary of my Case". 

    The title of this thread makes it sound like more than one person is being prosecuted simply for asking for help when they feel suicidal but you page says that -"There has never been another case of conviction for someone requesting help when truly suicidal and following medical advice from other parties". 

    If people are being wrongfully prosecuted then obviously it must be stopped but I would also hate for people who are suicidal to be put off asking for help for fear that they might be prosecuted. 

    Any clarity you can offer would be much appreciated. :) 

Children
  • in reply to Leaf

    The crowd funding site Crowd justice is there to raise the profile of legal issues ( and make a bit of money to run the site). My costs so far have been £60,000 and my appeal is another ?£15,000

    Perhaps I should explain the last paragraph section more fully, but it is complex research that I was doing ( that has been used by facebook) and I was definitely caught in an internet trap (while investigating scam sites)that sold or gave information in a distorted form to the police. The police withheld information in my trial, did not understand my autistic purpose, which was certainly not malicious in any way, but instead was a medical psychological action to save my life and my family.

    Prosecutions for malicious communication are increasing and there is a need to ensure they are appropriate and are not used if there is a valid reason for the communication. 

    Maybe I should change it ?? Only one contribution so far and that is from a friend