Moving away from stereotypes

I can't stand stereotypes and do not wish to be defined by my condition. I would rather people saw me as an individual with strengths and weaknesses, some of which can be explained by me having Asperger's syndrome, rather than defining me by a label. This is why I can't stand the word 'aspie'. While having Aspergers is an important part of my identity, it is no more important than me being female, no more important than my sexuality or my age.  I would hate it if someone did not see past me being a woman or past my age, why is having aspergers any different? The disability movement campaigned for disability to be seen not as an individual affliction or difference, to move beyond individualising disability and to see it as a societal problem: people with disabilities should campaign collectively to change society, making it imperative to see the person before the disability. I am a person with asperger's syndrome, not an aspie. I share traits that other people with AS may have,  but I don't share all the traits, just enough to have aspergers. We are all different, to say I am an aspie suggests conformity with other  'aspies' and obliterates the part of me that defies easy categorization.

Parents
  • Hmm... It's funny - the reasons you give for not self-identifying with the term 'aspie' are exactly the same reasons why I do self-indentify with that term (well, except I'm male, rather than female).

    That is to say, refering to myself as an 'aspie' is no different, to me, to refering to myself as being 'male' or '39'. Just as I am not the same as all other 'males', or all other '39 year olds', I am not the same as all other 'aspies'. It is just a label, that refers to my being part of a spectrum, it does not wholy define who I am.

    The map is not territory, and the word is not the person.

Reply
  • Hmm... It's funny - the reasons you give for not self-identifying with the term 'aspie' are exactly the same reasons why I do self-indentify with that term (well, except I'm male, rather than female).

    That is to say, refering to myself as an 'aspie' is no different, to me, to refering to myself as being 'male' or '39'. Just as I am not the same as all other 'males', or all other '39 year olds', I am not the same as all other 'aspies'. It is just a label, that refers to my being part of a spectrum, it does not wholy define who I am.

    The map is not territory, and the word is not the person.

Children
No Data