This is so common it has it's own term (Fictosexuality) and wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictosexuality). I'm sure many remember the news report about Akihiko Kondo 'marrying' miku hatsune. As I've been saying when AI starts becoming more avalable and your 'waifu' is a permanent presence in your home PC we are totally going to get blade runner 2049 style companions long before 2049 (https://youtu.be/4UYdhKfVwkU?si=PoWL7SyGOU8PMsGd)
The word fictosexuality describes someone's sexual orientation. It is the right term for the guy who married Hatsune Miku (I know her really well, as my son carries the Hatsune doll with him inside the house and also plays Hatsune's game! Yes, we're funs! ).
But if you're just daydreaming and fantasizing about fictional characters, and still have or want to have relationships with real people, it wouldn't count as a sexual orientation. I think it's limmerence, which is a lighter term, meaning that you just like escaping reality and imagining romantic adventures with fictional (or real but unreachable) characters.
The word fictosexuality describes someone's sexual orientation. It is the right term for the guy who married Hatsune Miku (I know her really well, as my son carries the Hatsune doll with him inside the house and also plays Hatsune's game! Yes, we're funs! ).
But if you're just daydreaming and fantasizing about fictional characters, and still have or want to have relationships with real people, it wouldn't count as a sexual orientation. I think it's limmerence, which is a lighter term, meaning that you just like escaping reality and imagining romantic adventures with fictional (or real but unreachable) characters.
It's quite hard to define how 'limmerence' is difrent than platonic affection.
In platonic affection there's no sexual desire. Anyways, whatever it is, it isn't something to worry about, unless it limits your normal life. So it's ok! We agree on this! I wasn't familiar with the term "fictosexuality" and I looked it up because you've mentioned it. So thanks for that! That's my new word for the day !
Maybe. My point is ... well A) sex and romance are not compleatly distinct for most people so the term still seems relevent. and B) the fact the term exists demonstrates this is failrly common.
Personally I dislike the term limmerence I find it a bit nebulous. It's quite hard to define how 'limmerence' is difrent than platonic affection.