GCSE options dilemma. Higher tier vesus lower tier?

My 13 year old Son has Aspergers and ADHD and is in mainstream school. He has to pick his options this month and the dilemma we face is that he excels in Science (level 7) and is good at Math (level 6a) and he really wants to do the triple Science award. His Science teacher is all for it and said he should sail through, but, he has been allocated the lower tier GCSE band and that means he cannot do triple science.

We have spoken to all of his teachers and they feel that he would cope in higher tier, his German teacher was the exception, he said that although he was top of the class at the moment (my Son is in set 3 of 6 sets in his year 9) he didnt feel he would cope at GCSE level. We went to the Deputy Head to discuss whether he could do higher tier so that he could do triple science but the Dep Head was just awful, so patronising and had no real interest in helping. He told our Son that it would involve extra work after school and that he wouldn't cope.The new English Baccalaureate is also being introduced so the school have told us that higher tier pupils MUST take a language and a humanity

We've worked hard to make sure our Son has the same chances as the other kids, we're just heartbroken to fall at the GCSE hurdle. We appreciate that our child may not achieve as well in all of his subjects as he will in Science and Maths but I'm at a loss as to how to challenge the schools belief that he shouldn't even be given the chance to shine at the subjects he is genuinely good at.

Has anyone else had this problem? Does he have to take the full set of GCSE's or can he drop some? I feel that fewer good exam results would be better than a higher number but with weaker results.

Parents
  • My son opted for lower tier in some subjects - it was explained that at higher tier if you do not get C - then you fail. Lower tier - no fail - but no A grade either. He got C on lower grade - but the possibility of failing would have been too much for him. He went on to BTec in Further Ed and then a degree in Uni. In hindsight (a wonderful thing) I would suggest looking at what he wants from his overall education and then work backwards. If overall he does want a science based route - then go for it - if not, don't. Ending up wanting something later that relies on a choice made at 14-16 is daunting. He doesn't have to know a full life plan - but doing the above could be useful. I kept my son in education for as long as possible, with all appropriate support. In that time he graduated at age 25 - he has developed beyond expectations. He is not work ready - but the time in education allowed him time to blossom. R
Reply
  • My son opted for lower tier in some subjects - it was explained that at higher tier if you do not get C - then you fail. Lower tier - no fail - but no A grade either. He got C on lower grade - but the possibility of failing would have been too much for him. He went on to BTec in Further Ed and then a degree in Uni. In hindsight (a wonderful thing) I would suggest looking at what he wants from his overall education and then work backwards. If overall he does want a science based route - then go for it - if not, don't. Ending up wanting something later that relies on a choice made at 14-16 is daunting. He doesn't have to know a full life plan - but doing the above could be useful. I kept my son in education for as long as possible, with all appropriate support. In that time he graduated at age 25 - he has developed beyond expectations. He is not work ready - but the time in education allowed him time to blossom. R
Children
No Data