speech and language therapy in school

Hi,

my son with asd is nearly 6 years old and attends a mainstream school. he has full time 1:1 and is pretty much non verbal. he can say single words and will repeat alot of what he hears. he can now say the odd random sentence but can't hold conversations. his statement has in the provision that he should have weekly SALT whilst needed and that the SALT should work with the TA showing them what to do so the input can ease away from weekly from SALT and over to the TA. SALT is to monitor progress and contribute to IEP's. Now he is in a new school year he hasn't had any SALT input directly though the school say they know what to do. i don't think they are spending any time on speech specifically now and my question is should they? they will argue that his speech is improving and it is, but how do i know that it wouldn't of improved more with more specialist input? how do i know if he would have improved even more had he had more SALT direct input?? should i ask for more or ask the school to tell me what speech work they are doing with him? has any one else found this? its so hard to know whats best. i also don't want to be left wondering in years to come if he had had more input would he be better? its so hard to know!! i hope i make sense!!

Parents
  • Hi,

     Ideally, where SALT is a significant issue for a child, the statment should include the words 'devised and delivered by a qualified SALT.'

    It's sounds very much like you don't have this level of provion covered in your statement. (Perahaps devised by a SALT and delivered by a TA.) This is not uncommon, I'm afraid.

    Personally, I would request all the copies of the SALT reviews done by the School and SALT to date, if you don't have them already. These should then indicate any significant improvement, if indeed their has been any. Provision cannot be withdrawn without your consultation, as I understand it. And for a School to be left in Limbo with no follow up or assessment, sounds pretty poor to me and possibly even a breach of the SEN code of practice and/or a failure on the part of the School in their duty to support the child in line with a legal document stating the childs needs.

    Their is good evidence to suggest early and well targeted support for SAL issues can make a good impact, but naturally it's down the individual's severity and the skills of those support your child.

    I would strongly suggest you contact IPSEA for advice. Try and phone and speak to an advisior if you can.

    I wish you luck. IPSEA's link below

    https://www.ipsea.org.uk/

    Coogy

Reply
  • Hi,

     Ideally, where SALT is a significant issue for a child, the statment should include the words 'devised and delivered by a qualified SALT.'

    It's sounds very much like you don't have this level of provion covered in your statement. (Perahaps devised by a SALT and delivered by a TA.) This is not uncommon, I'm afraid.

    Personally, I would request all the copies of the SALT reviews done by the School and SALT to date, if you don't have them already. These should then indicate any significant improvement, if indeed their has been any. Provision cannot be withdrawn without your consultation, as I understand it. And for a School to be left in Limbo with no follow up or assessment, sounds pretty poor to me and possibly even a breach of the SEN code of practice and/or a failure on the part of the School in their duty to support the child in line with a legal document stating the childs needs.

    Their is good evidence to suggest early and well targeted support for SAL issues can make a good impact, but naturally it's down the individual's severity and the skills of those support your child.

    I would strongly suggest you contact IPSEA for advice. Try and phone and speak to an advisior if you can.

    I wish you luck. IPSEA's link below

    https://www.ipsea.org.uk/

    Coogy

Children
No Data