Removed
Only because I respect your rules.
I was puzzled about the email sent that I should read enthusiastically - then it occurred to me to check the contact directory of UCL. Sure enough there is someone surnamed Longman, who may indeed have received a very mysterious email from Yemi.
I use Longman as a pseudonym on here, as indeed is recommended. It has nothing whatever to do with my real name.
well he has removed. It is up to all researchers to adhere to cross-universities codes of practice. The way this one responded to it being pointed out, he really shouldn't be doing research in UCL.
But then the whole autism sector suffers badly from poor research
I apologise for not reading your rules. However I have also sent you an email that I hope you will read as enthusistically as you wrote this.
To some extent I feel that your comments are patronising making an assumption that all of the above would have not been considered.
That being said I look forward to hearing from you :-)
University College London should be advising students NOT to do this. It goes against research ethics.
1. This is meant to be a safe site not a resource for researchers
2. It is an uncontrolled source of subjects - you don't know enough about the make up of this population and you cannot rule out bogus respondents.
3. There are confidentiality issues. Even using codes, personal details or details of resources can be disclosed.
4. You are asking people to trust you with personal information. Just being at UCL isn't enough
5. You are asking about children. There are very strict guidelines about asking about children
6. As a researcher at UCL you should not bring the university into disrepute. Doing this damages the image of your university.
7. You can fail in assessed research if you don't set up your data gathering correctly. If it is not to get a degree, you can expose your research to serious criticism when you come to publish.
8. If you post on a website you should read the rules, and it is polite to ask before doing this.
Honestly people like you bring serious research into disrepute