Safeguarding referral vs talking to family carer first (adult autistic person)

I’m looking for advice from people with experience of safeguarding and complex family situations. I’m trying to make a careful decision and would really value outside perspectives.
I’m concerned about an autistic adult woman who lives alone but is financially dependent on her parents. She has longstanding difficulties with independence, employment, and relationships, and has experienced significant pressure from her father to “be independent”, get a job, and even to marry. The parents don't accept her diagnosis. Financial support has sometimes felt conditional. There has also been verbally abusive language used in the home.
Over time, what initially looked like encouragement has begun to feel more like pressure without adequate support. She herself describes the situation as abusive, but she is also very loyal to her parents and frightened of what might happen if outside agencies get involved. She finds conflict extremely hard and struggles to advocate for herself.
In addition, she has expressed suicidal thoughts in the context of feeling trapped, overwhelmed, and unable to meet expectations. There is no immediate crisis at present, but this has added significantly to my concern about her emotional safety and wellbeing.
I’m torn between two options:
1. Submitting a safeguarding referral to the local authority, given concerns about coercive family dynamics, emotional harm, suicide risk, and unmet support needs; or
2. Talking to her father first to explain my concerns, in the hope that things might change without involving safeguarding.

My worries are:
that talking to her father first could increase pressure on her or lead to greater control or retaliation;
that making a safeguarding referral could damage relationships and make things harder for her in the short term;
that doing nothing feels ethically wrong, especially given the suicide risk.

There isn’t an immediate emergency, but the situation feels harmful, entrenched, and increasingly risky over time. I’m very aware that once a safeguarding referral is made, it can’t be undone. For those with lived experience or professional knowledge:

Is it generally safer to go straight to safeguarding where coercive family dynamics and suicide risk are present?
Are there situations where not speaking to the carer first is the safer option?
How do people balance respecting an autistic adult’s autonomy with the need for protection, especially when she may be fearful of consequences or under pressure?

I’m trying to act calmly, proportionately, and with her wellbeing at the centre, but I’m finding the responsibility heavy. Any thoughtful advice would be very welcome.

Parents
  • Hello Primel

    I’m so sorry we didn’t pick up on your post until now. 

    We can’t advise on individual safeguarding decisions, but from what you’ve described it would be appropriate to consider sharing your concerns with the relevant local authority, particularly where there are worries about emotional harm, coercive family dynamics and suicide risk. 

    The National Autistic Society does not operate a crisis or emergency service. If she is finding it hard to cope or has thoughts of harming herself, it’s important that she gets support. If there is any immediate risk of harm, please contact the emergency services on 999. You can also find information about safeguarding, social care and mental health crisis support on our Urgent Help page:
    https://www.autism.org.uk/what-we-do/help-and-support/urgent-help

    You might also find it helpful to look at the Ann Craft Trust, a charity focused on safeguarding disabled adults. They have clear information about disability and domestic abuse, including coercive and controlling behaviour:
    https://www.anncrafttrust.org/resources/disability-domestic-abuse/

    You’re clearly trying to do the right thing in a very complex situation. Whatever you decide, it’s okay to seek advice and support for yourself too.

    Kind regards

    Sharon Mod

  • Thank you both for your replies. I have decided that I had to act because of the credible risk of harm to the person. I have now contacted the council, and submitted a safeguarding report. They started a review immediately and I am impressed with how sensitively they seem to be handling this.  I am glad I did this. 

  • Oh that’s interesting! Which council is it? I wouldn’t have thought personally that the council was the appropriate body 

  • It seems many councils have set up Adults Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (MASH), which is a team of professionals from a range of organisations and agencies who work together to protect adults who may be at risk of abuse, harm or neglect. I think after a public enquiry into high profile safeguarding failures, one of the key insights was lack of coordination amongst agencies; and councils seem motivated to learn from those mistakes  

Reply
  • It seems many councils have set up Adults Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (MASH), which is a team of professionals from a range of organisations and agencies who work together to protect adults who may be at risk of abuse, harm or neglect. I think after a public enquiry into high profile safeguarding failures, one of the key insights was lack of coordination amongst agencies; and councils seem motivated to learn from those mistakes  

Children
No Data