• Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 65 subscribers
  • Views 617 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

statements

avy

Hi my son has been diagnosed with asperger and adhd and a question mark on the possibility of developing Tourettes he got turned down from having a statement, it was said they needed the proof of extra help he was receiving and that they wanted at least 15 hours proof ,the schools senco was not happy with this as she said he at least gets 22hours,so I pipped up and said they only wanted 15 so why didn't they send all the information on she just changed the subject.  we have now got an EP after a long time of asking for one, hopefully she can help me get some answers , my concern more than anything is I've got to find Joshua a school by October for the year after and with his school grades being so low can he cope in mainstream school or a school that specialize in asperger, but my I've been told he wouldn't be able to go to a school that specialize in asperger because he hasn't' got a statement can anybody help me please because I seem to be going round in circles

Parents

  • Hi Avy,

      We waited until his diagnosis before we applied for DLA sadly, so we had no other choice.

    You are fully within your rights to appeal whatever the circumstances. I appealed despite the SENCO's lack of recording of my sons lack of progress.

    It was negligence and she could not provide any evidence that sufficient progress had been made, because she hadn't actually bothered to monitored him!

    At Tribunal she provided one small sentence of intervention evidence for three years of supposed intervention. The judges were expecting extensive evidence of progress. She was laughed out of court!

    Fortunately, i had a private assessment from years earlier and commisioned another more recent assessment and it proved he'd made absolutely no progress  (In fact the disparity between his CA & SA. Chronological Age and Statutory Age had actually grown) despite the alledged one sentence of intervention the SEN dept insist they'd given. Surprize, Surprize!

    Additionally, as I understand it, exclusion is illegal in many cases if you believe the NAS thread posts of late.

    www.autism.org.uk/.../School-Exclusions-Service.aspx

    Joshua, and you, have rights and he should not be excluded illegally!

    The choice to appeal is ultimately your choice, but personally I'd get the ball rolling. It's the only thing that made my LEA sit up and listen.

    I was told later we had a huge litigation case, but we weren't interested in sueing, just getting the provision he needed.

    Good luck Hun

    Coogybear.

Reply

  • Hi Avy,

      We waited until his diagnosis before we applied for DLA sadly, so we had no other choice.

    You are fully within your rights to appeal whatever the circumstances. I appealed despite the SENCO's lack of recording of my sons lack of progress.

    It was negligence and she could not provide any evidence that sufficient progress had been made, because she hadn't actually bothered to monitored him!

    At Tribunal she provided one small sentence of intervention evidence for three years of supposed intervention. The judges were expecting extensive evidence of progress. She was laughed out of court!

    Fortunately, i had a private assessment from years earlier and commisioned another more recent assessment and it proved he'd made absolutely no progress  (In fact the disparity between his CA & SA. Chronological Age and Statutory Age had actually grown) despite the alledged one sentence of intervention the SEN dept insist they'd given. Surprize, Surprize!

    Additionally, as I understand it, exclusion is illegal in many cases if you believe the NAS thread posts of late.

    www.autism.org.uk/.../School-Exclusions-Service.aspx

    Joshua, and you, have rights and he should not be excluded illegally!

    The choice to appeal is ultimately your choice, but personally I'd get the ball rolling. It's the only thing that made my LEA sit up and listen.

    I was told later we had a huge litigation case, but we weren't interested in sueing, just getting the provision he needed.

    Good luck Hun

    Coogybear.

Children
No Data