bullying at school

The summer edition of Communication has an article on page 43 on bullying. I was rather shocked by this because it simply divided bullying into three main categories (physical, verbal and indirect) and then proceeded to offer advice for dealing with conventional bullying.

My perception of bullying where people on the spectrum are the victims is rather different from this. I wondered if other contributors felt the same way or disagreed.

In my perspective, people on the spectrum are usually bullied by people taking advantage of their vulnerabilities arising from autism - sensory overload, difficulty understanding social interaction and metaphorical or humorous remarks, special interests and manerisms that attract attention. I also perceive the bullying to involve a wider spectrum of individuals in a class, not just the usually identified bullies.

People on the spectrum may be seen as entertaining. Sensitivity to environment - sudden noise, people in close proximity, sudden movement, intimidatory atmosphere is enough to trigger considerable distress and possibly a meltdown. Other kids quickly realise that "pushing the right buttons" - mainipulating the vulnerabilities of people on the spectrum, could be managed as collective entertainment.

Being seen as different, not fitting in, having different interests, having unorthodox mannerisms, all make people on the spectrum more likely to be targeted. They may be hurt or disturbed by joking remarks or jibes that NT kids would recognise for what they were, but could cause great anxiety to someone on the spectrum.

I rather felt, from reading the Communication article, that it was as if people on the spectrum were just overly sensitive to conventional bullying and just needed to hear the conventional advice. But for someone with communication difficulties "fogging" and saying "No" can just add to the entertainment value as this would come over differently.

I was also concerned that after 50 years NAS seemed not to have grasped that bullying at school is one of the fundamental damaging experiences fior people on the spectrum, and this needs research, not platitudes.

Parents
  • If so Jim V mod, why is it so hard to find on the website, and why the article in "Communication"?

    The only route to bullying I can find on the website, and there are other locations I'd expect to find it, like "understanding behaviour", is via "Education". There is a section there headed "Bullying - a guide for younger people". The subsections under this address conventional bullying. There's no appreciation of people taking advantage of the vulnerabilities of people on the spectrum. 

    It is all very well giving me links, such as the video - if you have to give them to me, I cannot readily find them for myself. The web pages aren't that logical as a way into things people actually want to know.

    If you understand what's going on in the video clip, why does this not manifest in the section "Bullying - a guide for young people"?

    The video hinges on the communication difficulties and the misunderstandings, and the way people on the spectrum can be taken advantage of and abused. But its no use if that's not something readily accessible, and it doesn't inform the accessible bits of the website.

    I have had an email exchange with the Anti-Bullying Alliance, because other than mentioning it as a disability, they seem to have no grasp of autism as a factor. They have responded saying they will look into it and discuss in more depth with NAS. Having seen the article in "Communication", written largely by Kidscape who seem similarly unaware of autism related bullying, I'm not so sure that NAS will be much help to the Anti-Bullying Alliance.

    I appreciate you feel indignant at my criticism of NAS but while you can show me evidence, I'm not seeing that evidence in readily accessible pages of the website.

Reply
  • If so Jim V mod, why is it so hard to find on the website, and why the article in "Communication"?

    The only route to bullying I can find on the website, and there are other locations I'd expect to find it, like "understanding behaviour", is via "Education". There is a section there headed "Bullying - a guide for younger people". The subsections under this address conventional bullying. There's no appreciation of people taking advantage of the vulnerabilities of people on the spectrum. 

    It is all very well giving me links, such as the video - if you have to give them to me, I cannot readily find them for myself. The web pages aren't that logical as a way into things people actually want to know.

    If you understand what's going on in the video clip, why does this not manifest in the section "Bullying - a guide for young people"?

    The video hinges on the communication difficulties and the misunderstandings, and the way people on the spectrum can be taken advantage of and abused. But its no use if that's not something readily accessible, and it doesn't inform the accessible bits of the website.

    I have had an email exchange with the Anti-Bullying Alliance, because other than mentioning it as a disability, they seem to have no grasp of autism as a factor. They have responded saying they will look into it and discuss in more depth with NAS. Having seen the article in "Communication", written largely by Kidscape who seem similarly unaware of autism related bullying, I'm not so sure that NAS will be much help to the Anti-Bullying Alliance.

    I appreciate you feel indignant at my criticism of NAS but while you can show me evidence, I'm not seeing that evidence in readily accessible pages of the website.

Children
No Data