Skip to main content
Close Button
Donate
  • Replies 82 replies
  • Subscribers 35 subscribers
  • Views 8991 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

AS people, please can you help me?

classic codger
over 8 years ago

I am trying, with great difficulty, to understand something. I could really use your help with this, it's literaly taken me over (you know the one) and I need the thinking of others. Call it an intervention!

Before I begin, please can I ask you to look over the following article?;

nymag.com/.../

I have seen many posts from NT parents about 'treatment' for AS.

The question I have asked myself is, 'if I could go back and be changed into an NT by 'treatment', would I choose it?'

My firm answer is 'No'. I am the sum total of a life spent as an AS person. I can't change my past, so my best option is to use the learning that is  'the sum of who I am' to help others if I can, and especially for the next generation. If any of you think that I can be helpful and supportive, understanding and insightful, fine. If you think the opposite, also fine and I am sorry that I wasn't helpful. I do what everyone does - the best I can.

I'm an egalitarian by instinct. I will state my thoughts and opinions, but they are mine alone. When I read other people's posts, I assume the right to agree or disagree, and simply expect the same fairness back.

Thank you for listening this far, and now I've come to my taxing absorption.

I read this post under the title Stem cell treatment for autism: 'Has anyone undergone stem cell treatment for autism?'

I responded with '

This is my personal opinion. I don't argue my personal opinions, just for them.

How about 'tretament' for being NT? Their capacity for being the most illogical, spiteful, self-destructive creature on this planet leaves me staggered. I pity the poor creatures and their lack of insight, but what can you do? No-one is researching 'treatment' for them, because they collectively agree that their unsanity is 'normal'.

The inmates are running the asylum.

Now, I thought that I was humourously disparaging the idea of 'treating' people just because they are different. It is my belief that most people will be able to see that I have reiterated the concepts of the same thing as the poster, with our roles reversed. Here's your mirror, as it were.
I just discovered that I got moderated for this post . Apparently, I should watch my language. A particular word picked out is asylum because it is derrogatory towards past attitudes to mental health (?).
I am totaly confused. I don't know why 'mental health' is being brought into it. Given the various current uses of the word 'asylum' I don't know how it becomes offensive, even in context, 'the inmates are running the asylum' is a common concept and has been the root idea behind several award winning books, plays and films, yet it appears that some ignoramus doesn't like it. And apparently, I'm supposed to know this and understand it in their particular case. Que?
Please, any insights will do. Sooner or later one of you will say something that will help me get a grip on this. You know the one where the more you try, the more you're shaking your head, you're laughing bleakly, you don't know whether to be angry, offended, confused, puch drunk, weakened, disempowered, desperate to understand, shocked, fed up with mods public messages yet again, privacy invaded, and a whole bunch more, and because you can't choose one, you have them all at once instead. That's where I am right now.
Phew! Bit of a maze. Ariadne, the thread!
Parents
  • over 8 years ago

    I fully understand your position Technophobe23. There is history to all this, and if you've joined up since or were not party to the difficult threads, this must all seem very strange.

    I also think that if there are enough people like yourself around the forum may be able to start up again and maybe bring people back who feel at the moment they have to leave.

    I'm also glad Recombinantsocks is around to give a balanced view and attempt appeasement with the moderators. There is no point in being destructive in our reactions. The forum is (was) a valuable resource, and as Kolojaro has explained it is a lifeline and a guide to living with autism.

    The current problem is a break down in trust. Twice bitten, November and now, many of us old guard have had enough. It doesn't stop others trying to rebuild.

    My worry is that it wont be long before there's more heavy handed moderation. I really cannot see any evidence that Bob is going to stop this style of moderating. Five years we managed without this kind of intervention - moderation was always discrete. Three months we have had of what I regard as appallingly draconian over-reaction to the most trivial offences - low level swearwords that everyone uses in text like figures of speech being publically reprimanded. This is no way to run a forum.

Reply
  • over 8 years ago

    I fully understand your position Technophobe23. There is history to all this, and if you've joined up since or were not party to the difficult threads, this must all seem very strange.

    I also think that if there are enough people like yourself around the forum may be able to start up again and maybe bring people back who feel at the moment they have to leave.

    I'm also glad Recombinantsocks is around to give a balanced view and attempt appeasement with the moderators. There is no point in being destructive in our reactions. The forum is (was) a valuable resource, and as Kolojaro has explained it is a lifeline and a guide to living with autism.

    The current problem is a break down in trust. Twice bitten, November and now, many of us old guard have had enough. It doesn't stop others trying to rebuild.

    My worry is that it wont be long before there's more heavy handed moderation. I really cannot see any evidence that Bob is going to stop this style of moderating. Five years we managed without this kind of intervention - moderation was always discrete. Three months we have had of what I regard as appallingly draconian over-reaction to the most trivial offences - low level swearwords that everyone uses in text like figures of speech being publically reprimanded. This is no way to run a forum.

Children
No Data