Concerning article regarding disability rights in USA

NPR article on federal change to disability integration laws

So this article doesn’t strike me as necessarily an emergency, but I do feel as though it is a cause for alarm that things could potentially go backwards for people with disabilities here in America. It’s just the federal government changing a few words around in an old ruling about giving people with disabilities a chance for the most integration possible. However, that could easily snowball into further litigations upending the decades of work activists have done to secure rights for Americans with disabilities. As I’ve interpreted from this article, this could be a tipping point towards going back to sending most individuals with disabilities into facilities like institutions and nursing homes with the intention of hiding them from the world and limiting how much funds the government invests into them.

I imagine this probably will not impact the lives of most Autistics that need minimal support, but obviously it is important for anyone disabled to stand up for those with other disabilities (similarly to how it is important for non-hetero individuals to stand up for trans folk and visa versa). Besides, I personally have a stake in this regardless of having low support needs myself, since my current job depends on individuals with disabilities having a right to work in the community. I’d hate to see us return to having this population working primarily in closed-off workshops instead of being encouraged to utilize their skills with the community at large.

Parents
  • I do sometimes worry that things such as "reasonable adjustments" could be prone to watering down in the future. 

    It does not help that the Conservative Party and now the Labour Party has done nothing to help the disabled and their carers. They want people in work, but gutted SEND support for personalised help in higher education, they have forced the bedroom tax on disabled households and keep the carer's allowance ridiculously low and the work rules so tight meaning couples can't try to supplement their low income with part time work or risk falling foul of the £200 limit. 

Reply
  • I do sometimes worry that things such as "reasonable adjustments" could be prone to watering down in the future. 

    It does not help that the Conservative Party and now the Labour Party has done nothing to help the disabled and their carers. They want people in work, but gutted SEND support for personalised help in higher education, they have forced the bedroom tax on disabled households and keep the carer's allowance ridiculously low and the work rules so tight meaning couples can't try to supplement their low income with part time work or risk falling foul of the £200 limit. 

Children
  • Whoa whoa hold up: In the UK you can only earn up to 200 pounds sterling before they take away your benefits?! Am I reading that right?

    Like, I felt like the restrictions here in my state were pretty tight, but that is astounding. If I’m reading correctly, that might be in the ballpark of like $500 less than what we’re allowed to make! (although we have a distinction between two types of social service benefits and they have different, convoluted rules that I obviously do not want to get into lol. $500 is an extremely rough estimate)