More kitchen gadgets, but does it mean eating better or more healthily?

I persuaded myself to buy an Instant Pot  - a pressure cooker, steamer & slow cooker in one. My main aim was saving energy as prices rocket. But will this improve my cooking or lead to healthier eating? Will it 'save time'?  Despite all my appliances, I find myself regularly making, 'on toast', jackets, sandwiches and all sorts of cakes and biscuits.

Is your kitchen full of gadgets you rarely use? Why doesn't someone design a comprehensive appliance instead of a myriad of cooking modes - toaster, microwave, ice-cream/yoghurt maker, air fryer, conventional oven, slow cooker, pressure cooker, kettle? Despite all the gadgets, do you eat better? Or do they sit doing very little except looking shiny and filling your kitchen? Time and again I'm lead astray by clever marketing and persuasive arguments about the latest science of healthy eating. 

Parents
  • Mmm I do have a slow cooker and I use it intermittently usually in the winter. Most people I speak to seem to own an air fryer these days but I don’t.

    I can’t say I’m a gadget person I would probably struggle to work them. I like simple things that are well made, I don’t have an electric kettle I have stove top kettle, I figured there is less to go wrong with it and I shouldn’t have to replace it often.

    The last thing I bought that might be a gadget but I’m not sure was a Moccamaster filter coffee machine, it’s a water drip type just nice and simple and well made and nice to look at at its in yellow and black and it makes me feel nice inside every time I look at it.

    I think batch cooking works for me regarding healthy eating.

    A thing of beauty right!!

    Blush

Reply Children
No Data