Restore the Aristocracy, end democracy.

Sitting here waiting for my tooth brush to charge listening to Waltz No 2. 

I am in favour of restoring the Aristocratic High State, which was in power in Britain until the 1906 general election. I feel they will know what to do and will restoring a functioning state. 

England has gone down hill massively since 1906 and there is no way this current progressive Liberal ideological interventionist state can fix any of the problems in the country, because they created all of them to begin with by melting in society. 

The High state created common law, Parliament, the currency, the English language, the Anglican Church, the Royal Navy, the civil service so on and so forth. The low state has destroyed all of it in the name of English progressive Liberalism and destroying the High State itself. 

All High art, High culture, High Church Anglicanism, investment in the arts, university, theater, technology and innovation come from the willingness of the Aristocracy to uplift society, rather than changing it. 

The welfare state, NHS, abortion, national trust, privatization of the railways, utilities, post office all comes from the criminal state control of the progressive low state. We had the finest integrated railway network in the world and they ripped it up because they were poor commoners and bought off by the car industry, they used WW1-WW2 to force through there ideology, when there ideology caused those wars and murdered 1,000,000 British people for nothing. 

They also brought forth this new generation of rich people who create nothing of beauty and lasting value, as opposed to the Aristocracy. England was a self-governing society, a union of the High culture and folk culture, which created a wonderful, rich, powerful place. Since the overthrow its become a depressing, poor, weak place which can't function on its own terms, it can't even maintain basic rights like Jury trial. 

  • So you are telling me here that the High state functioned in line with human nature to make the ruling class wealthier and more famous? 

    Sorry you family member was treated like that. 

  • Put forward my views and frustrations with current Liberal state we live under and propose a different solution than most people come into contact with. I know my political views are odd. I share them with about 7 online people and that's it. Hahaha. 

  • High Tory comes out of the Cavalier side of the English civil war, it then become Tory after the 1830's reform acts, until the repeal of the Corn Laws, which then Ended political High Toryism in Britain. It somewhat migrated to Canada, but died there too. The Conservative party has simply no relation to the Tory party before the 1830's. The lead High Tory was Lord Salisbury, but the party under him was Conservative a totally different perspective on society. 

    The rail system of today is not private, the stay controls the infrastructure and regulates the market, while it sells off the profitable parts of the railways to the bidder which can bribe the right people. What I support is the restoration of the old railways before WW1, where we had over 130 railway companies running independent services all over the country, with some going bust every year. 

    The lack of state investment in the railways since 2010, for HS2 has been a disaster for the country.  

  • Now these are all allegedly but to claim the royal family is not at least regularly in dodgy company and looking the other way is absurd

    You are again trying to argue against what I have said by introducing ideas that have nothing to do with my comments.

    You are welcome to post your own opinions, but there is no point in trying to argue against a non existent narrative. I haven’t confirmed, denied or had an opinion about what the Monarch or Royal Family members may or may not have done. I have not claimed anything about Royal Family members—I have simply stated facts.  

  • The prince formerly known as Andrew is an alleged paedophile. King Charles was a close personal friend of Jimmy Saville and provided a character reference for a church of England bishop found guilty of child sexual abuse and the deceased Lord Mountbatten (the kings uncle) was alleged to be a paedophile given that he had two young boys from a children's home on his boat when it was blown up by Irish Republicans. Now these are all allegedly but to claim the royal family is not at least regularly in dodgy company and looking the other way is absurd. 

  • Sorry your point about the railways does not make sense given the Tory's ripped up BR. Which as you note, was the only railway to make a profit and ran without subsidy on Intercity routes. Compare that with our private system where we spend three times the BR subsidy for a much poorer service.  

  • it was to further their own wealth and fame, not to uplift society.

    Absolutely!

    Ben

  • Dear Ferrosol,

    When posting or commenting please be mindful of Rule 4: No harmful or offensive content
    Do not post or link to anything graphic, obscene, defamatory, impersonating someone else, or infringing copyright.

    Thank you,

    Olivia Mod

  • You're being very optimistic we're still ruled by an unelected clan of Half-German paedophiles

    My point was that the government we have is better than the Aristocratic High State that the original post was about. I don’t know why you think I’m very optimistic as I made no further opinion on how our current government was elected or how it has been performing.

    There is no evidence to suggest that the Monarch and other working members of the Royal Family are paedophiles and while they may have German ancestry, they are British. 

  • You're being very optimistic we're still ruled by an *removed due to Rule 4* who got their power based on whose womb they fell out of and don't have to pay income tax or inheritance tax and are exempt from equalities and employment law.

    Something like 3/4ths of our prime ministers went to Eton and many of our prominent "journalists" and celebrities got their start because of relatives in their respective industries 

    We have the second largest parliament in the world (after China) thanks to the bloated House of Lords which has a mixture of hereditary failsons from aristocratic families, has-been politicians and is one of only two parliaments where religious leaders from the state religion have a say over political decisions (it's us and Iran.) 

    Most of them may not have an aristocratic title but they're steeped in privilege and money and you have to be very lucky and skilled to break into that group.

    That's the reason the country is falling apart not because of a lack of true nobility  but that we've created an incestuous class of powermongers that are all married to each other went to the same schools and go to the same parties with the same viewpoints. 

  • Good point well made imo  Grinning  It looks as though   has few supporters on here of these views (i.e. none) Stuck out tongue closed eyesThumbsup

  • The aristocracy was just preserved theft and/or reward for fornication. Either one of your ancestors was a tribal leader who dispossessed their followers of control of tribal lands, as happened in the Highlands, or you were descended from one of the men of blood who were victorious in 1066 and stole land from the natives, which Ordericus Vitalis characterised as a 'monstrous theft', or one of your ancestors was a king's by-blow. None of these routes into the aristocracy is particularly meritorious, or invests their descendants with any sort of innate moral, cultural or political superiority.

  • This crackpot idea doesn't warrant debate. I'm not sure what you hope to achieve by posting this stuff to be honest.

  • All High art, High culture, High Church Anglicanism, investment in the arts, university, theater, technology and innovation come from the willingness of the Aristocracy to uplift society,

    I disagree - whilst these things were funded by the aristocracy it was to further their own wealth and fame, not to uplift society.

    My grandmother was born in 1905 and when I was little she told me stories of her life "in service" as a maid in the "big houses" when she was a young woman. I wouldn't want anyone to have to live like that.

  • This is similar to your post a while back.

    Despite reading your comments and other responses back then, I haven’t altered my views on what a nightmare world your Aristocratic High State would be for me if it were to happen even in my dreams.

    Thankfully, the country moved on from being ruled by people with undue power because of their birthright. Tufton Street et.al. can play make believe all they like but the world carries on without them. 

    The world is in a shocking state at the moment. Power and glory have gone to the heads of leaders of Russia and the US especially, but a relatively tiny country like Britain has limited power and an Aristocratic High State would be a frightening proposition in today’s polarised world.