Restore the Aristocracy, end democracy.

Sitting here waiting for my tooth brush to charge listening to Waltz No 2. 

I am in favour of restoring the Aristocratic High State, which was in power in Britain until the 1906 general election. I feel they will know what to do and will restoring a functioning state. 

England has gone down hill massively since 1906 and there is no way this current progressive Liberal ideological interventionist state can fix any of the problems in the country, because they created all of them to begin with by melting in society. 

The High state created common law, Parliament, the currency, the English language, the Anglican Church, the Royal Navy, the civil service so on and so forth. The low state has destroyed all of it in the name of English progressive Liberalism and destroying the High State itself. 

All High art, High culture, High Church Anglicanism, investment in the arts, university, theater, technology and innovation come from the willingness of the Aristocracy to uplift society, rather than changing it. 

The welfare state, NHS, abortion, national trust, privatization of the railways, utilities, post office all comes from the criminal state control of the progressive low state. We had the finest integrated railway network in the world and they ripped it up because they were poor commoners and bought off by the car industry, they used WW1-WW2 to force through there ideology, when there ideology caused those wars and murdered 1,000,000 British people for nothing. 

They also brought forth this new generation of rich people who create nothing of beauty and lasting value, as opposed to the Aristocracy. England was a self-governing society, a union of the High culture and folk culture, which created a wonderful, rich, powerful place. Since the overthrow its become a depressing, poor, weak place which can't function on its own terms, it can't even maintain basic rights like Jury trial. 

Parents
  • All High art, High culture, High Church Anglicanism, investment in the arts, university, theater, technology and innovation come from the willingness of the Aristocracy to uplift society,

    I disagree - whilst these things were funded by the aristocracy it was to further their own wealth and fame, not to uplift society.

    My grandmother was born in 1905 and when I was little she told me stories of her life "in service" as a maid in the "big houses" when she was a young woman. I wouldn't want anyone to have to live like that.

  • So you are telling me here that the High state functioned in line with human nature to make the ruling class wealthier and more famous? 

    Sorry you family member was treated like that. 

Reply Children
  • The problem is that the society functioned and saw massive progress, wealth, power and improvements in the standard of living, it had a proper culture and customs, the state was far less involved in the life of the nation and the British military was good too. Where was the oppression? People had recourse to Parliament to the common law. Like I don't get it. At any point the Aristocracy was like 5,000 people in a population of 30 million in the late 1800's. Millions of people who not in the employ of the Aristocracy and abused by there position. 

  • So you mean the Aristocracy paid people to serve them, the people had no other choice so the Aristocracy treated them terribly? And they had no recourse because the Aristocracy had money and power? 

  • Sorry you family member was treated like that

    Thank you for that comment, however I cannot understand how you would have any sympathy for people who were servants when you want to restore the aristocracy?

    Surely you can't have an aristocracy without servants, therefore you must think it's ok for people to have to go into domestic service to survive?

  • "Sorry you family member was treated like that."

    As you full know, the point is that it wasn't just one person's family member treated like that, it was huge numbers of people viewed as inferior by a supposed "upper" class. It was an awful period in our history and yes, while a lot was achieved in terms of the infrastructure of the nation, it was done at the cost of oppressing millions. Wanting to return to that is ill thought out and fantastical bollocks. It will never happen, so why waste time on it?