Restore the Aristocracy, end democracy.

Sitting here waiting for my tooth brush to charge listening to Waltz No 2. 

I am in favour of restoring the Aristocratic High State, which was in power in Britain until the 1906 general election. I feel they will know what to do and will restoring a functioning state. 

England has gone down hill massively since 1906 and there is no way this current progressive Liberal ideological interventionist state can fix any of the problems in the country, because they created all of them to begin with by melting in society. 

The High state created common law, Parliament, the currency, the English language, the Anglican Church, the Royal Navy, the civil service so on and so forth. The low state has destroyed all of it in the name of English progressive Liberalism and destroying the High State itself. 

All High art, High culture, High Church Anglicanism, investment in the arts, university, theater, technology and innovation come from the willingness of the Aristocracy to uplift society, rather than changing it. 

The welfare state, NHS, abortion, national trust, privatization of the railways, utilities, post office all comes from the criminal state control of the progressive low state. We had the finest integrated railway network in the world and they ripped it up because they were poor commoners and bought off by the car industry, they used WW1-WW2 to force through there ideology, when there ideology caused those wars and murdered 1,000,000 British people for nothing. 

They also brought forth this new generation of rich people who create nothing of beauty and lasting value, as opposed to the Aristocracy. England was a self-governing society, a union of the High culture and folk culture, which created a wonderful, rich, powerful place. Since the overthrow its become a depressing, poor, weak place which can't function on its own terms, it can't even maintain basic rights like Jury trial. 

Parents
  • I really enjoyed history in school, we had a teacher who was good at engaging his class. I remember studying 19th century politics which was rife with corruption and 'rotten boroughs', and life expectancy was an average of 40 due to the fact most children died, though to the creation of the welfare state and the realisation that hygiene and access to food and clean water could save a lot of lives.

    It's interesting to see what people idolise.

Reply
  • I really enjoyed history in school, we had a teacher who was good at engaging his class. I remember studying 19th century politics which was rife with corruption and 'rotten boroughs', and life expectancy was an average of 40 due to the fact most children died, though to the creation of the welfare state and the realisation that hygiene and access to food and clean water could save a lot of lives.

    It's interesting to see what people idolise.

Children
  • So you are telling me that under the high state things massively improved? Like we went from a food/slavery based society to a industrial/fossil fuel society, then a technological one under the High state over 100 years. The most impressive advance is human understanding and living standards in history, all under the rule of the Aristocracy. And you retort is 'things were bad and got much much better? 

    Also child mortality is much higher now than it should be because the state aborts over 200,000 baby's a year. And current mortality/life expectancy has stalled and is starting to go backwards. The High state made the industrial and technological revolutions possible, the low state has squandered it. Keep in my the High State only needed in 1906, so if you look at the progress from 1660 to 1906, come that society to our current one, you see why I support the restoration of the High state because the low state doesn't function.