What's with the 'Rating' and downvote options?

I am struggling to see anything positive coming from having the ability to rate peoples posts from 1 to 5 stars. Do the developers/forum owners realise we are a pool of people who tend to struggle regulating our emotions and likely have strong RSD? Of all places to be able to downvote or poorly rate someone's comment - geez, you'll have folk off worrying what they done wrong, feeling unfairly treated or ruminating for days over a low score. I suspect I am not alone here, but as a software engineer myself, this has to be one of the worst features I've ever seen on such a site. I've seen people post with such emotion and detail, struggling to find a voice and then seeing a 1 star rating on it and it really bothers me. I hate to think what the other person is then thinking after seeing this. 

If any product owner/manager reads these or there is a feedback section, you should strongly consider removing this option and instead simply have upvotes with the point being, the most upvoted content gets shown first (... Reddit ... cough, cough ...)

Parents
  • It's also I think very easy to accidentally click on the rating, and then it won't let you change it which is a terrible system flaw too.

    Or not even realised you've clicked on it? I've been wondering if that is a problem?

  • Ohhh if that's happening then that's extremely poor design. I think the problem is the fact the rating system exists at all. We should start a small army ... :D

  • We should start a small army ... :D

    This thread isn't about the ratings although that's been discussed here before:

     RE: List of forum faults part 2 

    Don't try to go to newest as it hangs.

    The thing is that many of us have tried to improve the forum and failed.

    We were asked about emoticons and reactions and which type we would like, gave feedback and the old voting system remained.

    We were asked once about what improvements could be made to the forum generally as a new one was being rolled out, and lots of suggestions were given, but we got back an almost identical forum with more faults.

     RE: New forum? Really? 

    There have been suggestions too of changing to a different, more modern type of forum but I don't think there is the will or the funds from the people running this one to effect change.

    I've come to the conclusion that we are stuck with it and that eventually, hopefully, faults will be remedied.

    It's old and clanky but it's what we've got.

  • I think I'd be happy with a fire and a public library.

  • You now have me thinking about decorating a cave! How cool would that be. As long as it had plug sockets I’d be fine ….. 

    yeh sorry, I just go into tech talk and realise too late. 

  • I wasn't insulted by your comment about living in a cave, I'm sure many people here think that I do, I'm such a dinosaur, I was quite amused, even thinking of how I'd decorate my cave.

    I dont' understand your second paragraph, I mean I know what the individual words mean, just not when they're put together like that.

  • The cave comment was aimed at the forum owners/engineers that built it, not you, or anyone else so sorry you interrupted it that way. 

    A more modern forum would be functionally more stable, more responsive, optimised, and would definitely get rid of the stat rating. There’s a whole bunch of enhancements under the hood that no doubt could be made. 

Reply
  • The cave comment was aimed at the forum owners/engineers that built it, not you, or anyone else so sorry you interrupted it that way. 

    A more modern forum would be functionally more stable, more responsive, optimised, and would definitely get rid of the stat rating. There’s a whole bunch of enhancements under the hood that no doubt could be made. 

Children