It does not have to be a "brainiac" but someone that you always find worth checking what it says, despite agreeing or not.
One of them may be Sean Carroll for me. I should get some more. And Chomsky, but he is off the map now due to health issues.
It does not have to be a "brainiac" but someone that you always find worth checking what it says, despite agreeing or not.
One of them may be Sean Carroll for me. I should get some more. And Chomsky, but he is off the map now due to health issues.
hehe Martin "signs were used mainly as tools to obtain rewards" - and in what way is that not what most humans do??
I've had a quick "google" for Richard Dawkins and sign language - he's doing lectures with sign language support so perhaps you're right.
On a Pythonesque perspective perhaps they both might leave a sandal or gourd or two around... :-)
hehe Martin "signs were used mainly as tools to obtain rewards" - and in what way is that not what most humans do??
I've had a quick "google" for Richard Dawkins and sign language - he's doing lectures with sign language support so perhaps you're right.
On a Pythonesque perspective perhaps they both might leave a sandal or gourd or two around... :-)