It does not have to be a "brainiac" but someone that you always find worth checking what it says, despite agreeing or not.
One of them may be Sean Carroll for me. I should get some more. And Chomsky, but he is off the map now due to health issues.
It does not have to be a "brainiac" but someone that you always find worth checking what it says, despite agreeing or not.
One of them may be Sean Carroll for me. I should get some more. And Chomsky, but he is off the map now due to health issues.
Carroll is new to me, thanks for the tip - ever since "The Dancing wu-li masters" the cross-over with science and spirituality has interested me,
Steven Pinker - I first came across his work in dialectic with Chomsky on linguistics. Since then I especially enjoyed his work on popularising "thinking about thinking".
the last one is a bit of a cheat as it really refers to a type of thinking rather than an individual : "Lao Tzu"
Carroll is new to me, thanks for the tip - ever since "The Dancing wu-li masters" the cross-over with science and spirituality has interested me,
Steven Pinker - I first came across his work in dialectic with Chomsky on linguistics. Since then I especially enjoyed his work on popularising "thinking about thinking".
the last one is a bit of a cheat as it really refers to a type of thinking rather than an individual : "Lao Tzu"