"Functioning" Labels

What are your thoughts on the "high functioning" and "low functioning" labels? They seem to be going out of fashion, and for good reasons. How would you describe yourself?

If someone were to tell me, "Oh, but you're very high functioning," they would completely be missing the point that I am only usually so in some areas while rarely so in other areas. They just see how different I am to a "real" Autistic person like Rain Man! However, what they don't see is that I'm working really hard to mask my difficulties as much for their benefit as for my own. I only appear "high functioning" because I'm trying really hard to function in those areas that I find particularly challenging. A person who is non-speaking, say, is then stigmatised as "low functioning" because they can't keep up the pretence the way I can, even if they function better than me in many other areas.

Are these "functioning" labels just a rating system for how good you are at masking and making other people feel less uncomfortable?

Parents
  • I'm high functioning except with tech and maths then I just just sit and stare at it and don't understand and I do it when I have to fill in forms too, give me a 10k word dissertation to research and write and I'm fine, a form and I go to pieces

  • I get that with forms at times. I think beforehand that it's going to be easy, but then I get stuck wondering, "OK, but what exactly do they mean by X?" I just go round and round and can't answer.

    I had to (legally) fill in a government workplace survey before and one of the questions was something like, "What is your attitude to change?" The options were something like "Very Positive", "Positive", "Neutral", "Negative", "Very Negative". I just couldn't get past what they meant by "change". What? A pay rise? A pay cut? Getting fired? Longer hours? A 4-day week? More pot plants? Free lunches? WHAT!? I had to leave it blank after consulting with HR (who consulted with the relevant government agency). It reminded me of Yes, Minister on TV where the civil service considered any change to be unconscionable.

Reply
  • I get that with forms at times. I think beforehand that it's going to be easy, but then I get stuck wondering, "OK, but what exactly do they mean by X?" I just go round and round and can't answer.

    I had to (legally) fill in a government workplace survey before and one of the questions was something like, "What is your attitude to change?" The options were something like "Very Positive", "Positive", "Neutral", "Negative", "Very Negative". I just couldn't get past what they meant by "change". What? A pay rise? A pay cut? Getting fired? Longer hours? A 4-day week? More pot plants? Free lunches? WHAT!? I had to leave it blank after consulting with HR (who consulted with the relevant government agency). It reminded me of Yes, Minister on TV where the civil service considered any change to be unconscionable.

Children